Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishal Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opp. Party
2024 Latest Caselaw 4828 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4828 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Vishal Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opp. Party on 3 May, 2024

Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           Cr.M.P. No. 660 of 2022


            Vishal Kumar, aged about 20 years, Son of Raju Ravidas, resident of
            Qtr. No. 397 E-Block, Sector -V, P.O. -Bhuli, P.S. -Bank More, District -
            Dhanbad.
                                                   ....                Petitioner


                                        Versus

            The State of Jharkhand                 ....                   Opp. Party


                                        PRESENT

                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
                                      .....

For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Praveen Shankar Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. .....

By the Court:-

1. Heard the parties.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to

quash the order taking cognizance dated 24.02.2021 for the offences

punishable under Section 201, 25 (1-B) (a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act,

passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad

including the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Jharia P.S.

Case No. 259 o9f 2020, the same being the second F.I.R. in respect of

the same occurrence.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that during the investigation

of Jharia P.S. Case No. 251 of 2021, registered for the offences

punishable under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with murder of Vinod Jha,

police came to know that inter-alia the petitioner was present near

the place of occurrence of the death of Vinod Jha and Police

interrogated the petitioner and the three co-accused persons in

connection with the said case being Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020

and they disclosed that Vinod Jha committed suicide with a pistol

and these three persons threw the pistol with a stick under the

bushes and threw the mobile phone of the deceased Vinod Jha at a

distance under a culvert and on the basis of the written report of the

Police Sub-Inspector of Jharia Police Station, this case has been

registered.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this

case being Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 is the second F.I.R. in

respect of the same occurrence. Relying upon the Judgment of

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Babubhai Vs. State of

Gujarat and Others, reported in (2010) 12 SCC 254, para-21 of which

reads as under:-

"21. In such a case the court has to examine the facts and circumstances giving rise to both the FIRs and the test of sameness is to be applied to find out whether both the FIRs relate to the same incident in respect of the same occurrence or are in regard to the incidents which are two or more parts of the same transaction. If the answer is in the affirmative, the second FIR is liable to be quashed. However, in case, the contrary is proved, where the version in the second FIR is different and they are in respect of the two different incidents/crimes, the second FIR is permissible. In case in respect of the same incident the accused in the first FIR comes forward with a different version or counterclaim, investigation on both the FIRs has to be conducted."

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this

F.I.R. being Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 be quashed and set aside

and the prayer as prayed for in this criminal miscellaneous petition

be allowed.

5. The learned Spl. P.P. fairly submits that the F.I.R. of Jharia P.S. Case

No. 259 of 2020 do not involve any new discovery.

6. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going

through the materials in the record, it is pertinent to mention here

that as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the

case of T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala reported in (2001) 6 SCC 181

that fresh investigation based on second or successive F.I.Rs, not

being a counter case, filed in respect of the same or connected

cognizable offence alleged to have been committed in the course of

same transaction and in respect of which pursuant to the first F.I.R.

either investigation is under way or final report under Section 173 (2)

Cr.P.C. has been forwarded to Magistrate may be a fit case for

exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or under Article 226/227

of the Constitution of India.

7. Now coming to the F.I.R. of Jharia P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020, the

same has been registered on 16.12.2020 in connection with murder

and disappearance of evidence of murder of Vinod Jha. In the F.I.R.

of Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 which has been registered on

23.12.2020, subsequent to the F.I.R. of Jharia P.S. Case No. 251 of

2020 because Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 has been registered on

23.12.2020; there is reference to the facts of Jharia P.S. Case No. 251 of

2020 and there is categorical admission by the informant of Jharia

P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 that during the course of investigation only

of Jharia P.S. Case No. 251 of 2020, the occasion arose for

interrogation of the petitioner and the three co-accused persons of

Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020. Thus, this Court has no hesitation in

holding that the F.I.R. of Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 on being

put to the test of sameness, reveals that the F.I.R. of Jharia P.S. Case

No. 259 of 2020 relates to the same incident in respect of the same

occurrence and are in regard to the same incidents which are two or

more parts of the same transactions in respect of which Jharia P.S.

Case No. 251 of 2020 has been registered.

8. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the Considered view

that this is a fit case where in exercise of the power under Section 482

Cr.P.C., the entire criminal proceeding including the First

Information Report of Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 and the order

taking cognizance dated 24.02.2021 be quashed and set aside.

9. Accordingly the entire criminal proceeding including the First

Information Report of Jharia P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 and the order

taking cognizance dated 24.02.2021 is quashed and set aside.

10. In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 3rd May, 2024 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter