Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahavir Giri @ Mahavir Goswami vs The State Of Jharkhand
2023 Latest Caselaw 1876 Jhar

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1876 Jhar
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2023

Jharkhand High Court
Mahavir Giri @ Mahavir Goswami vs The State Of Jharkhand on 2 May, 2023
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                         Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 563 of 2022
     Mahavir Giri @ Mahavir Goswami                      --- --- Appellant
                                     Versus
     1.The State of Jharkhand
     2.Karina Kumari                                      --- --- Respondents
                                           .......

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR

For the Appellant : M/s Kaushik Sarkhel, Gaurav Abhishek, Advocates For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P.

For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, Advocate

04/02.05.2023 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State assisted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim, respondent no.2 on I.A. No. 9769 of 2022.

It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the appellant with a prayer to release him on bail during pending of this appeal.

The instant appeal was preferred against the judgment dated 10.02.2022 and the order of sentence dated 11.02.2022 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-I cum Special Judge, POCSO, Bokaro in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 66 of 2021 whereby and where under the appellant has been convicted under Section 354(b), 506 of the I.P.C and Section 12 of the POCSO Act and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years and a fine of Rs.5000/- and a default sentence u/s 354(b) of the IPC; R.I. for 2 years and a fine of Rs.2000/- and a default sentence u/s 506 of the IPC and R.I. for 2 years with a fine of Rs.3000/- and a default sentence u/s 12 of the POCSO Act.

It has been pointed out on behalf of the appellant that he is in jail since 24.06.2021 and the maximum sentenced awarded in this case is 3 years and almost 2 years of sentence has been served by the appellant. Further, it has been pointed out that the alleged incident had taken place on 13.06.2021 and the F.I.R was instituted on 18.06.2021 after inordinate delay of 5 days without any cogent reason. Further, it has been pointed out that more than half of the sentence has been served by the appellant in this appeal and this appeal is not likely to be taken up for hearing in the near future and therefore, the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Further, it is submitted that the appellant agrees to make payment of

the fine amount imposed by the learned court below towards victim compensation to the victim (P.W.2).

On the other hand the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State assisted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant- victim respondent no.2 has opposed the prayer of bail made on behalf of the appellant.

I have heard the parties and perused the record of the case. In the light of the persuasive submission advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant, it is found just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. Accordingly, the appellant, named above, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge 1st cum Special Judge (POCSO), Bokaro in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 66 of 2021 subject to the condition as set out under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C and further subject to the condition that the appellant shall pay the entire fine amount as awarded by the learned court below under different heads/ forms, which comes to Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) by way of compensation in order to give it to the victim P.W.2 without being prejudiced to his right of defence.

The learned court below is also directed to issue notice to the P.W.2. when the said find amount is deposited by the appellant. After her appearance and on proper identification the said amount of fine i.e., Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) shall be disbursed to the victim P.W.2 without any prejudice to the rights of the appellant.

I.A. No. 9769 of 2022 is allowed. The scanned copy of the LCR has been received. Let this case be listed under the heading for hearing in seriatim.

(Navneet Kumar, J.)

A.Mohanty

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter