Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1064 Jhar
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 71 of 2023
Dilip Kumar ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others ... ... ... ... Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---------
For the Appellant: Party In Person For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, Addl. S.G.I.
---------
Oral Order 03/Dated: 02.03.2023
The writ petitioner, who is appearing in person, relies upon
certain observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraph
392 of the reported judgment of Rojer Mathew Vs South Indian
Bank Ltd through its Chief Manager [(2020) 6 SCC 1].
The learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for
the Union of India shall also take instructions why a Circuit Bench of
Armed Forces Tribunal should not function at Ranchi or any other
suitable place in view of the fact that grievance of the appellant are
considered in the State of Jharkhand itself.
Let this matter be listed on 06.04.2023.
(S. K. Mishra, C.J.)
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Manoj/Umesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!