Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishna Kumar Keshri vs The State Of Jharkhand And Another
2022 Latest Caselaw 866 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 866 Jhar
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Krishna Kumar Keshri vs The State Of Jharkhand And Another on 4 March, 2022
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
              Criminal Revision No.547 of 2016
                            --------
Krishna Kumar Keshri                           ... Petitioner
                                    Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Another                      ... Opposite Parties
                                                                (Through V.C)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

For the Petitioner : Mr. Hadish Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP For the O.P No.2-Bank : Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate

--------

Order No.11/Dated:4th March 2022

By an order dated 30th August 2016, proceedings in connection with Spt G.R No.841 of 2012 were stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.

Thereafter the matter appeared on different dates but hearing of this criminal revision petition could not be concluded primarily because adjournment requests were made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Kumar, the learned APP, has provided status of the trial which according to him is still pending at the stage of framing of charge.

In "Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Another v. CBI" (2018) 16 SCC 299 the Hon'ble Supreme Court issued a specific direction to all Courts including the High Courts that all interim orders shall stand vacated after expiry of six months if not extended by subsequent order(s). This was again made clear in the order dated 15th October 2020 passed in a miscellaneous application filed in "Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Another" wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under:

" ...... We expect that a Magistrate all over the country will follow our order in letter and spirit. Whatever stay has been granted by any Court including the High Court automatically expires within a period of six months, and unless extension is granted for good reason, as per our judgment, within the next six months, the trial Court is, on the expiry of the first period of six months, to set a date for the trial and go ahead with the same."

2 Criminal Revision No.547 of 2016

Mr. Hadish Ansari, the learned counsel, is seeking adjournment on the ground that Mr. A. K. Chaturvedi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, is engaged in a matter before the Hon'ble DB-I.

Let a report be called from the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Gumla as regards compliance of the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Another".

The learned Principal District and Sessions Judge shall prepare report within two weeks and submit before this Court about continuance of any interim order which was passed beyond the period of six months and not continued by any express order either of the Court concerned or the Hon'ble High Court, by calling report from all Presiding Officers within the Judgeship of Gumla.

Post this matter on 1st April 2022.

Let a copy of the order be transmitted to the Court concerned through 'FAX'.

(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) Amit/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter