Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Om Prakash Barnwal vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd
2022 Latest Caselaw 3096 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3096 Jhar
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Om Prakash Barnwal vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd on 8 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

              W.P.(C) No. 4225 of 2013
Om Prakash Barnwal                             .......                  Petitioner
                        Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Jhumritelaiya branch, Koderma and Ors.    ....           Respondents
                        ---------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

----------

For the Petitioner      : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
For the Respondents     : Mr. G.C. Jha, Advocate
                        -----------
              th
06/Dated: 08 August, 2022

This writ petition is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,

wherein, the order dated 27.05.2013 passed by the learned Principal District

Judge-cum-Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Koderma in Execution Case

No.08 of 2012, is under challenge, whereby and whereunder, the petition

filed on behalf of the petitioner for passing an order under Section 174 of the

Motor Vehicles Act 1988 has been rejected.

It has been submitted that the payment, in the entirety has been made

by the writ petitioner in favour of the claimant, by virtue of the Award dated

11.03.2008 passed in M.A.C.T. Case No.04 of 2006, whereby and

whereunder claimants are held entitle to compensation of Rs.5,85,500/- with

interest @ 6% per annum, by fixing the entire liability upon the writ

petitioner.

The writ petitioner being aggrieved with the Award dated 11.03.2008

passed in M.A.C.T. Case No.04 of 2006, has questioned the same by filing

an appeal, being M.A. No.115 of 2008, which was disposed of vide

judgment dated 18.11.2009. The same has been allowed with the following

direction:

"(1) The Tribunal shall decide only the genuineness and validity of the driving licence so produced by the appellant by allowing him to adduce evidence.

(2) After deciding the genuineness of the driving licence, after recording a finding with regard to the driving licence, the Tribunal shall decide as to who is liable to pay the compensation amount.

(3) In the meantime both the appellant and the respondent- Insurance Company shall deposit the compensation amount in equal share before the Tribunal and the same shall be paid to the claimants-respondents.

(4) In the event the liability is decided in favour of one party, the other party shall recover the amount so paid to the claimants."

The writ petitioner in pursuance to the aforesaid judgment passed by

this Court in M.A. No.115 of 2008, has deposited a sum of Rs.2,67,750/-

through cheque on 27.01.2010 and also paid Rs.25,000/- on 23.08.2010,

thus, the total amount of Rs.2,92,750/- have been paid by the writ petitioner

in favour of the claimant.

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Koderma on the basis of the

judgment passed by this Court in M.A. No.115 of 2008, decided on

18.11.2009, has passed a final judgment on 01.12.2011, holding that the

driver of the vehicle had a valid driving licence and as such, the Insurance

Company is only liable to pay compensation.

The writ petitioner, in the aforesaid backdrop, and in consequence

thereto, has filed a petition by invoking the jurisdiction conferred to the

Tribunal under Section 174 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for refund of an

amount of Rs.2,92,750/- which has been paid in terms of para 3 of the

direction contained in the judgment passed in M.A. No.115 of 2008, but, the

same has been rejected vide order dated 27.05.2013.

In course of argument, Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel

appearing for the writ petitioner has submitted that if an amount of

Rs.2,92,750/- will be refunded in favour of the writ petitioner, the same will

be suffice.

Upon this, Mr. G. C. Jha, learned counsel appearing for the United

India Insurance Co. Ltd., on instruction, submitted that an amount of

Rs.2,92,750/- as referred in paragraph 6 and the reference of the said amount

has also been made in the impugned order, the respondent- United India

Insurance Co. Ltd. is ready to refund it back in favour of the writ petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that the

matter can be settled and as such may be referred before the National Lok

Adalat scheduled to be held on 13.08.2022.

In view thereof, the matter is being referred to the National Lok

Adalat scheduled to be held on 13.08.2022.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Saket/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter