Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pradeep Kumar Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 3787 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3787 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Pradeep Kumar Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand on 5 October, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 374 of 2019
            Pradeep Kumar Singh                                             ....Appellant
                                             Versus
            The State of Jharkhand                              ...           Respondent
                                      ----
            CORAM:         Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
                          Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
                                      ---
            For the Appellant         : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
            For the State             : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P
                                             ---
05/05.10.2021             Heard learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Rakesh Kumar and

learned A.P.P, Mr. Ashok Kumar on the prayer for suspension of sentence made by this appellant through I.A. No. 3254 of 2021.

Sole appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 363/34 and 364(A)/34 of I.P.C by the impugned judgment dated 25th February, 2019 passed in Sessions Trial No. 67 of 2005 by the Court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, II, Giridih and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and default sentence under Section 364(A)/34 of I.P.C. and further sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and default sentence under Section 363/34 of I.P.C by the impugned order of sentence dated 27th February, 2019. Both the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the victim is P.W.4. As per his statement made during trial he had not named this appellant and one Arun Yadav before the Police. It is submitted that there is no demand of ransom as per the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that the victim had named three accused persons, namely, Pradeep Goswami, Ranjit Singh and Dinesh Goswami. According to him, Ranjit Goswami had handed over custody of victim to two other persons, who had taken him to the Jungle. Though, in his examination-in chief, he has referred to the name of this appellant and Arun Yadav as having taken him towards Jungle, but in his statement made at paragraph 30 during cross examination he says that he did not name these two persons before the Police. This appellant is in custody since 17th January, 2019 and from the date of conviction i.e., 25th February, 2019. As such, he has completed about 2 years and 10 months of custody. Therefore, appellant may be enlarged on bail by suspending his sentence during pendency of this appeal.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has opposed the prayer. He further submits that the victim has stated in his examination-in-chief that the appellant and one Ajay Singh were handed over the custody of the victim and they had taken him to Jungle. Learned A.P.P. has upon instruction stated that there is no criminal antecedent of this appellant. However he submits that appellant may not be enlarged on bail.

We have considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and taken note of the materials relied upon by them from the Lower Court Records, including the period of custody undergone by the appellant.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances noted above and that the victim has, in his cross-examination, stated that he had not named these two persons before the police during investigation and there is no criminal antecedent of this appellant as also taking into account that the appellant is in custody since 17th January, 2019, we are inclined to grant bail to the appellant by suspending his sentence during pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, appellant, above-named, shall be released on bail, during the pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, II, Giridih in connection with Sessions Trial No. 67 of 2005 with the condition that appellant and his bailors shall not change their address or mobile number without permission of the learned Trial Court. Appellant and their bailors shall also furnish their photo copy of Aadhar Card before the Trial Court.

I.A. No. 3254 of 2021 stands allowed.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J) Jk/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter