Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandan Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 4500 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4500 Jhar
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Chandan Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand on 30 November, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                              Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 244 of 2017

        1.      Chandan Singh
        2.      Lav Kumar Singh                                ---   ---    Appellants
                                             Versus
        The State of Jharkhand                              ---      ---   Respondent
                                              ---

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

---

                For the Appellants       : Mr. B.M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate
                                           Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate
                For the State            : Mr. Suraj Verma, A.P.P.

10/30.11.2021         Heard Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and learned

A.P.P. on the prayer for suspension of sentence of the appellants made through I.A. No.7062 of 2019.

The appellants stand convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. vide impugned judgment of conviction dated 12.01.2017 passed in S.T. No. 312 of 2013 by the learned court of Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Garhwa and have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for life with a fine of Rs.20,000/- and a compensation of Rs.30,000/- payable by each vide impugned order of sentence dated 19.01.2017.

Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants submits that there is an apparent contradiction in the story put-up by the informant father (P.W.2) and the uncle (P.W.1) with that of the wife of the deceased (P.W.6). P.W.2 father has in the Fardbeyan stated that at 12:00 in the night on hearing cries of his son, he went out of the house and saw the accused persons assaulting him with Balua and Gandasa at the instance of one Sudarshan Singh in the wheat field of Prem Yadav, as a result of which he died. The wife of the deceased P.W.6 in her testimony categorically stated that the deceased was sleeping with her in the night when accused persons including others namely Dukhan Singh, Jamuna Singh, Parsu Singh, Parikha Singh (12 accused) assaulted her husband with a Balua, as a result of which he fell down and died. In her cross- examination also she has stated the same. It is further submitted that other prosecution witnesses P.W.9, 16, 17 and 18 have turned hostile, whereas P.W.10, 10A, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 have not seen the occurrence. They claimed to have seen the dead body in the morning. It is submitted that the

appellants have remained in custody since 18th January 2013 i.e. about 8 years and 10 months. There are no chances of the appeal being heard in near future. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the appellants deserve to be enlarged on bail by suspending their sentences.

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer. It is submitted that the prosecution story has been duly supported by P.W.1 and 2 who are the eye- witnesses and there are corresponding injuries found on the deceased during post-mortem conducted by Doctor P.W.5 vide Ext.7 post-mortem report. Therefore, the appellants may not be enlarged on bail.

We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taken note of the materials on record relied upon by them including the period of custody undergone by the appellants.

Having regard to the testimony of P.W.1 and 2 who say that they came out of the house in the night at 12:00 a.m. on hearing Hullah of the deceased and saw the deceased being assaulted by the accused persons in the field of one Prem Yadav and the testimony of P.W.6 wife of the deceased who has stated that the deceased was sleeping with her when the accused persons and others assaulted her and that the appellant has remained in custody for about 8 year and 10 months by now, we are inclined to grant the privilege of suspension of sentence to the appellants during pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, appellants are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Garhwa in connection with S.T. No. 312 of 2013 with the condition that the appellants as well as their bailors shall not change their addresses and mobile numbers, if any, without prior permission of the learned trial court and shall submit Aadhar Cards at the time of their release. I.A. No.7062/2019 stands disposed of.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J) Shamim/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter