Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunil Kumar Agarwal vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 1837 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1837 Jhar
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Sunil Kumar Agarwal vs The State Of Jharkhand on 24 May, 2021
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                       (Civil Writ Jurisdiction)
                           W.P.(C) No. 2236 of 2020
                                        ..........
          Sunil Kumar Agarwal                              ............Petitioner
                                     Versus
         1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Health Medical, Education & Family Welfare Department cum Appellate Authority (Drug and Cosmetic), Namkum, Ranchi.

3. The Director (Drug), Directorate of State Drug Control, Namkum, Ranchi.

4.The Drug Inspector, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur.

....... Respondents

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO (Through:- Video Conferencing)

-----

      For the Petitioner                : Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate
      For the Respondent                : Mr. Akhilesh Shrivastava, Advocate
                                          Mr. Manoj Kumar, G.A.-III
07/Dated: 24/05/2021

             Heard, learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned letter dated 07.07.2020 passed by the Director (Drugs), State Drug Control Directorate, Ranchi, cancelling the licence of the petitioner [Drug License Nos. JM 1- 106669 & JM 1106670, Forms 20B & 21B (issued on 15/05/2012, renewed on 15.05.2017 valid up to 14/05/2022].

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that though under Section 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945, the appeal is to be preferred within a period of three months before the competent appellate authority/ State Government/ Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand but the Writ Petition is maintainable even though there is alternative remedy under the law. The counter-affidavit, supplementary counter affidavit and other documents have been brought on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna, in the case of Universal Drug House Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar and Others, reported in AIR 2004 Pat 86 has already restored the licence of such defaulter, who has committed illegality in dealing with one drug, which was not authorized by the drug licnecing authority, as such, complete cancellation of licnece by the authority has been set aside by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna, as such, this judgment may also be considered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that appeal is maintainable under Section 66(2) of the Drug and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 and petitioner is also ready to prefer an appeal, but since the time has already been elapsed, as such, delay in preferring the appeal may be condoned if this Court directs the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the competent authority. Learned counsel, Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III has no objection. Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the petitioner to prefer an appeal under Section 66(2) of the Drug and Cosmetic Rules, 1945, with application for condonation of delay as the petitioner has preferred writ petition before this Court without preferring the appeal provided under Section 66(2) of the Drug and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 and if such petition is filed the appellate authority / State Government/ Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand shall look into the matter on merits and will also take note of all the judgments relied upon by the parties.

It is expected that the concerned authority shall pass necessary order within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal, though there is lockdown because of the Covid-19, but since the livelihood of the petitioner is jeopardized and at stake because of such pendency of the litigation, as such, this Court also directs the Health Secretary, Government of Jharkhand to look into the matter so that appeal preferred by the petitioner may be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal.

Petitioner shall file an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of 30 days from today.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is hereby disposed of.

(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.) R.S.-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter