Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shahina Praween vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 988 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 988 Jhar
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Shahina Praween vs The State Of Jharkhand on 26 February, 2021
                                            1                   [W.P.(S) No. 2472 of 2020]




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                               ----

W.P.(S) No. 2472 of 2020

----

Shahina Praween, wife of Anwar Hussain, aged about 61 years, resident of Chistiya Mohallah, Hazaribag, PS-Sadar, PO and District-Hazaribagh ..... Petitioner

-- Versus --

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagannathpur, District Ranchi

3.Director, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagannathpur, District Ranchi

4.District Education Officer, Hazaribagh, PO, PS and District Hazaribagh ...... Respondents

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Afaque Ahmed, Advocate For Resp.-State :- Mr. Awnish Shekhar, Advocate

----

5/26.02.2021 Heard Mr. Afaque Ahmed, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Awnish Shekhar, the learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for direction upon the respondents to grant revised scale benefit in favour of the petitioner at par with the teachers working/retired from the Government schools and pay her the consequential benefits including the revision in pension and other benefits.

4. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in Laxmi Muslim Girls Middle School, Hazaribagh and has retired from her service on 31.02.2019 on attaining the age of superannuation. The said school is a Government aided recognized minority middle school and the teachers

working in the said school are getting their salary from the coffers of the State Government. Besides, the teachers who have retired from the said school have also received their admissible retiral dues from the State Government. The Resolution dated 20.02.1990 has been issued by the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, whereby a decision has been taken that the recognized non-government minority primary, middle and secondary schools, recognized Sanskrit school and Madarsa teachers, non-teaching employees will be given pay allowances and other monetary benefits at par with the teaching and non-teaching employees of the State Government.

5. Mr. Afaque Ahmed, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered in view of the circular and the petitioner is entitled for 5th pay revision w.e.f. 01.04.1997 and further monetary benefits of revised scale as per the 6 th Central pay revision w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and the consequential benefits. He submits that others have been provided the same and the petitioner has been left out.

6. Mr. Awnish Shekhar, the learned counsel for the respondent State submits that the representation of the petitioner is still pending.

7. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 annexing all the credentials on which the petitioner is relying for such relief.

8. If such representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the respondent no.3 shall take a decision in accordance with the rules, regulations and the guidelines, particularly, the said circular and the judgment contained in Annexure-4 and will pass a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks further thereafter.

9. It is needless to say and if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, the benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioner within a period of six weeks further thereafter.

10. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition sands disposed of.

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J) SI/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter