Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vandana Devi & Others vs Aruna Choudhary & Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 3031 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3031 Jhar
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Vandana Devi & Others vs Aruna Choudhary & Anr on 23 August, 2021
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
           (Civil Miscellaneous Appellate Jurisdiction)
                  M.A. No. 124 of 2018
                           ........
Vandana Devi & Others                       .... ..... Appellants
                             Versus
Aruna Choudhary & Anr.                      .... ..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO (Through : Video Conferencing) ............

For the Appellants : Mr. Nikhil Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate ........

07/23.08.2021.

Heard, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Nikhil Ranjan and learned counsel for the respondent No.2, Mr. Ashutosh Anand.

The claimants namely, (1) Vandana Devi, (2) Puja Shahi and (3) Arpit Raj (appellant no.3 is minor son represented through his legal guardian mother appellant no.1 i.e. Vandana Devi) have preferred this appeal for enhancement of the award dated 18.01.2018 in Motor Accident Claims Case No.55/2015 passed by learned District Judge-II-cum-Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (M.A.C.T.), Bokaro, whereby the claimants have been awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.11,95,000/- subject to deduction of Rs.50,000/-, if paid, under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act without interest and if the compensation amount is not paid within one month from the date of the award, the Insurance Company shall be liable to pay penal interest @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of this order till its relalization.

Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that future prospect has not been considered by the learned Tribunal in view of judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors. reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680 paragraph-59.4, which should have been 25% as the deceased was aged about 43 years, which falls between the age group of 40 to 50 years. It has further been submitted that interest has been awarded on the compensation amount if the same is not paid within one month from the date of award and that too @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of the award without assigning any reason, which should have been @7.5 % per annum from the date of filing of claim application in view of the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Dharampal and Sons Vs. U.P. State

Road Transport Corporation reported in (2008) 12 SCC 208 and in view of Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Learned counsel for the United India Insurance Company Limited, Mr. Ashutosh Anand has submitted that though the Insurance Company has not preferred any appeal against the impugned award, but under the conventional head excess amount i.e. Rs.75,000/- has been paid contrary to the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (Supra) (Para-59.8) i.e. Rs. 40,000/- for loss of consortium, Rs. 15,000/- for funeral expenses and Rs. 15,000/- for loss of estate i.e. Rs.70,000/-.

In reply to that, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Nikhil Ranjan has submitted that though this amount has not been assailed by the appellants, but there is a direction passed by the Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (Supra) (Para-59.8) that amount under the conventional head should be enhanced by 10% after every three years, as such, Rs.75,000/- given under the conventional head by learned Tribunal may not be reduced as the accident is of dated 04.05.2015 and said judgment was delivered by the Apex Court on 31.10.2017.

Learned counsel for the United India Insurance Company Limited, Mr. Ashutosh Anand has submitted that the said judgment was delivered on 31.10.2017 and that can only be considered for an accident, which took place after 31.10.2017, but not for the accident, which took place on 04.05.2015.

In reply to that learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Nikhil Ranjan has submitted that 10% enhancement in conventional head is to be considered from the date of accident even though the judgment has been passed by the Apex Court in the year 2017.

Considering the submissions, this Court considered that no appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company and it appears that admittedly future prospect has not been considered by the learned Tribunal while granting the award, as such, 25% of future prospect is enhanced by this Court.

Further, interest has been paid in case of non-payment of compensation amount within a period of one month from the date of award and that too @ 6 % per annum from date of award till realization,

which is contrary to the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Dharampal & Sons (Supra) and also contrary to Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act whereby interest should be @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of claim application, as such, this Court allows interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of claim application.

So far with regard to conventional head is concerned, since the accident is of dated 04.05.2015 and the award has been passed on 18.01.2018, as such, this Court considered it to be rational to enhance the amount under conventional head by 10% on the appeals pending after 31.10.2017, as such, this amount is considered to be Rs.77,000/- in view of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (Supra).

Accordingly, this Court is computing the compensation afresh:-

      Income                             Rs. 10,000/- per month
      Annual Income                      Rs. 10,000/- x 12 = Rs. 1,20,000/-
      25% future prospect              Rs. 1,20,000/- + Rs. 30,000/-

Pranay Sethi (Supra) (Para-59.4) = Rs. 1,50,000/- 1/3rd deduction towards personal Rs.1,50,000/- x 1/3 = Rs. 50,000/-

      and living expenses
      Sarla Verma (Supra) (Para-30)
      Total                              Rs. 1,50,000/- - Rs. 50,000/-
                                         = Rs.1,00,000/-

Multiplier of 14 (as the deceased Rs. 1,00,000/- x 14 = Rs. 14,00,000/- was in the age group of 40-50 years) Sarla Verma (Supra) (Para-42) Conventional Head Rs. 77,000/- ( i.e. for loss of estate Pranay Sethi (Supra) ((Para- Rs.15,000/-, for funural expenses 59.8) Rs.15,000/-, for loss of consortium Rs.40,000/- with enhancement of 10% every three years.) Total Compensation Amount Rs. 14,00,000/- + Rs. 77,000/-

= Rs. 14,77,000/-

Accordingly, this court directs that the aforesaid amount shall be paid along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of claim application till realization.

However, amount paid under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act and any other amount paid pursuant to award passed by the learned Tribunal shall be deducted from the aforesaid amount and balance amount

shall be paid by the Insurance Company within a reasonable period as accident is of dated 04.05.2015.

Accordingly, the instant Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed.

(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.) Jay/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter