Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 773 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2025
Serial No. 77
Suppl. cause list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 314/2025
Muneeb Ahmad Shah and Anr.
..... Appellant/petitioner(s)
Through: -
Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Malik, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and Ors.
..... Respondent(s)
Through: -
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE (ORDER) 19.02.2025
The case of the petitioners/accused in nutshell is that they came to be
arrested in connection with FIR No. 24/2022 of Police Station Baramulla,
registered under Section 307 IPC on 13.02.2022 on the allegation of
attempting to commit the murder of one Mushtaq Ahmad Ganie S/o Ali
Mohammad Ganie R/o Kanlibagh, Baramulla (hereinafter referred to as
deceased). Subsequently, the petitioners came to be admitted to bail by the
competent Court on 25.02.2022, but unfortunately due to the subsequent
death of the deceased, the offence under Section 307 IPC was substituted by
the one under Section 302 IPC and the petitioners were re-arrested in the
case. That in the meantime, the Investigating officer presented the final
report under Section 173 of the Code before the learned trial Court and the
formal charges under Section 304-1 IPC came to be framed against the
petitioners/accused on 06.02.2023. That however, the UT of J&K, assailed
the order regarding framing of charge against the petitioners/accused under
Section 304-1 IPC, before this Court and this Court vide its Judgment/order
dated 04.06.2024, directed framing of charges against the petitioners under
Section 302 IPC, which is reported to have been done on 04.07.2024 by the
learned trial Court.
It is contended by the petitioners in the instant petition that no
prosecution witness has been till date examined and the learned trial Court
ought to have conducted an expeditious trial of the case having regard to the
fact that the petitioners are facing detention in the case since February, 2022.
As according to learned counsel for the petitioners, the accused have
fundamental right to speedy trial guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India. Learned counsel while making a reference to a latest
Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, submitted that, the instant case can
be disposed of at this threshold stage by passing appropriate directions
regarding holding of expeditious trial in the case.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion
that admittedly as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
instant petition can be disposed of at this threshold stage by passing of
appropriate directions regarding expeditious trial of the case.
Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the
learned trial Court to conduct an expeditious trial in the case concerned and
make an endeavour to hear the case on weekly basis.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(MOHD YOUSUF WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 19.02.2025 "Mohammad Yasin Dar"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!