Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1259 j&K
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021
Sr. No. 91
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
ATJAMMU
CJ Court
Case: CCP (S) No. 499 of 2019
Brij Bhushan and Others .....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Sh. Jatinder Choudhary, Advocate
v/s
Sanjeev Verma and others .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Sh. D. C. Raina, Advocate General with
Sh. Raman Sharma, AAG
Sh. R..K.Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Sh. Jugal Kishore, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICERAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
06.10.2021
The contempt petition arises out of an interlocutory order dated
14.12.2018 passed in OWP No. 2555 of 2018, 'Brij Bhushan and Others v.
State of J&K and Others'.
Since the aforesaid writ petition has been decided by us by a separate
judgment and order passed today, the interlocutory order passed therein stands
merged in the final judgment and ceases to exist.
Accordingly, we do not deem it necessary to proceed any further in
the contempt proceedings and the same is directed to be consigned. Contempt
notice shall stand discharged.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
JAMMU
06.10.2021
Tilak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!