Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ghulam Ahmad Wani vs Union Territory Of Jk & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 502 j&K/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 502 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2021

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench
Ghulam Ahmad Wani vs Union Territory Of Jk & Ors on 1 May, 2021
                HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
                          AT SRINAGAR
                                                           WP(C) No. 1828/2020
                                                             CM No. 5452/2020

                                                           Reserved on: 28.04.2021
                                                        Pronounced on: 01.05.2021

Ghulam Ahmad Wani.

                                                                   ...Petitioner(s)
                           Through: Mr M.S. Latief, Senior Advocate with
                                    Mr Zahid Khan, Advocate.
                                        vs
Union Territory of JK & Ors.
                                                                 ...Respondent(s)
                           Through: Mr B.A. Dar, Sr AAG.
CORAM:

             Hon'ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge.
             Hon'ble Mr Justice Vinod Chatterji Kould, Judge.

                                 JUDGMENT

Per Magrey; J;

01. Challenge in the instant petition is made to the order passed by the

Central Administrative Tribunal Bench, Jammu, (Hereinafter referred to as

the CAT Bench) on 22nd of September, 2020 in OA No. 577/2020 in case titled

Ghulam Ahmad Wani vs Director, Horticulture, Planning and Marketing &

Anr., as also the order of suspension bearing No. 182/DHPM of 2020 dated

13th of August, 2020, issued by the Respondent No. 2/Director Horticulture

Planning & Marketing, with further relief of allowing the instant writ petition

with direction to the respondents to process the case of the petitioner for

release of retirement benefits i.e. pension, leave salary, gratuity etc.

Brief Facts of the case;

02. The petitioner while in service states to have been placed under

suspension, pending inquiry, in terms of order bearing No. 182/DHPM of

2020 dated 13th of August, 2020, issued by the Respondent No. 2.

                                   Page 2 of 3                 WP (C) No. 1828/2020
                                                                CM No. 5452/2020



Immediately, after suspension, the petitioner claims to have retired from

service on 31st of October, 2020, as notified by the respondents in terms of

notification dated 13th of June, 2020. Withholding of pensionary benefits after

retirement is claimed to have been the cause of action for the petitioner for

approaching the CAT Bench, for its release.

03. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the

material on record.

05. The question whether Respondent No. 2/ Director Horticulture

Planning & Marketing is competent to place the petitioner under suspension,

alongwith other questions qua relief claimed in the OA is pending before CAT

Bench, for final decision, therefore, it shall not be proper to discuss the merit

of the case, that may prejudice the rights of the parties.

06. Regarding the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that

pending decision in the OA, the petitioner was entitled to the release of

pensionary benefits including leave salary, gratuity etc, by application of

Article 168-A and 168-D of Civil Service Regulations, with further

application of judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in case

titled Gh. Mohi-Ud-Din Lone versus State of JK & Ors reported in 2020 (6)

JKJ 346 [HC], we are not inclined to make any observation or record any

finding as regards the entitlement of the petitioner by application of such law

because that would amount to deciding the matter which is subject of OA

before CAT Bench, Jammu, but not withstanding such observations, we are

satisfied to issue directions to the respondents for concluding the departmental

proceedings as initiated against the petitioner before his retirement as also for

release of provisional pending, subject to further result of proceedings

pending before the CAT Bench.

                                                     Page 3 of 3                 WP (C) No. 1828/2020
                                                                                  CM No. 5452/2020



07. In the above background, this writ petition is allowed to the following

extent;

i. Respondents are directed to conclude the departmental proceedings against the petitioner within two months from the date copy of the order is served on them.

ii. Respondent No. 2/ Director Horticulture Planning & Marketing, shall process the case of the petitioner for release of provisional pension as also leave salary, gratuity till final disposal of the OA pending before CAT Bench.

08. Writ petition alongwith connected CM(s) shall stand disposed of on the

above terms.


                                    (Vinod Chatterji Koul)             (Ali Mohammad Magrey)
                                            Judge                              Judge
           SRINAGAR:
           01.05.2021
           "Hamid"

                                           i.    Whether order is speaking?          Yes/No.
                                           ii.   Whether order is reportable?        Yes/No.




ABDUL HAMID BHAT
2021.05.01 10:39
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter