Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 910 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2021
Sr. No. 2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
(through virtual mode)
CRM(M) 308/2019
Showkat Hussain
.....Petitioner (s)
Through :- Mr. Showkat Ali Khan Advocate.
V/s
.....Respondent(s)
Nazia Jeelani
Through :- Mr. H.U.Salati Advocate.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
1 This is a petition filed under Section 482 IPC by the petitioner
seeking to recall the judgment dated 07.11.2019 passed by this Court in
CRM(M) 254/2019 to the extent of relying upon and applying the judgment of
Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of 'Shayara Bano vs. Union of
India and others, (2017) 9 SCC 1 with regard to the 'triple talaq' pronounced
in the year 2014.
2 The short grievance projected by the petitioner in this petition is
that this Court disposed of CRM(M) 254/2019 vide its judgment dated
07.11.2019 relying primarily on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme court in the
case of Shayara Bano (supra). It is contended that the said Judgment was
pronounced in the year 2017, whereas in the instant case, the divorce i.e., triple
talaq' was pronounced in the year 2014. It is further contended that the
judgment in the case of Shayara Bano (supra) could not have been applied to
declare the validity of 'triple talaq' pronounced in the year 2014.
3 The argument raised is not tenable for the reason that the
judgment rendered in the case of Shayara Bano (supra), if not made to operate
prospectively specifically is to be treated as retrospective and applicable even
to the pending cases. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while declaring the 'triple
talaq' as null and void in the eye of law in the case of Shayara Bano (supra) did
not specifically make the judgment to operate prospectively and that being the
position, the law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shayara Bano's
case (supra) would apply equally to the 'triple talaq' pronounced prior to
passing of the said judgment. For this reason, no case is made out to recall the
judgment dated 07.11.2019 passed in CRM(M) No. 254/2019.
4 This petition is without merit and is dismissed, accordingly.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE Jammu 16.08.2021 Sanjeev
Whether the order is speaking: Yes
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!