Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 476 j&K
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2021
Serial No.212
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
SLA No. 106/2014
In CONCR No. 94/2014
CRAA No. 98/2014
State of J and K ...Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Sanchit Verma, Advocate vice
Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
v/s
Arvind Gupta ....Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
CONCR No. 94/2014
Despite service none has appeared for the respondent.
Reply to this application has also not been filed.
For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an
affidavit and in the absence of rebuttal from respondent, the same is allowed
and the delay of 141 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stand disposed of.
SLA No. 106/2014
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the
impugned judgment.
It has been contended that despite recovery of bribe from the
respondent, the learned trial Court has acquitted the accused on the ground
In CONCR No. 94/2014 CRAA No. 98/2014
that demand and acceptance of bribe has not been cogently proved by the
prosecution. It is further contended that the prosecution has succeeded in
proving the ingredients of the offence with convincing evidence, which has
been ignored by the learned trial Court.
Having regard to the contentions raised by learned counsel for the
petitioner, a case for grant of leave to file appeal against the impugned
judgment is made out.
Application is, accordingly allowed and leave to file appeal against
impugned judgment is granted.
Registry to list the main appeal for admission on 14.07.2021.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE Jammu 15.04.2021 Renu
RENU BALA 2021.04.19 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!