Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 549 HP
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.6775 of 2020 a/w connected
matters.
Decided on: 07.05.2025
1. CWPOA No. 6775 of 2020
Kamlesh Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
H.P. Road Transport Corporation Ltd.& anr.
...Respondents.
2. CWPOA No.6777 of 2020
Rakesh Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
H.P. Road Transport Corporation Ltd.& anr.
....Respondents.
3. CWPOA No.6781 of 2020
Rakesh Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
H.P. Road Transport Corporation Ltd.& anr. ......Respondents.
4. CWPOA No.6787 of 2020
Ashok Kumar ......Petitioner
Versus
H.P. Road Transport Corporation Ltd.& anr ......Respondents.
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
( 2025:HHC:13248 )
For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Tomar,Mr. Vinay Sharma
& Mr. Parveen Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
All these petitions are being decided by a common order in
view of the involvement of identical question of fact in all these
petitions.
2. The petitioner(s) have prayed for directions against the
respondent(s) to appoint them on the post of Transport Multi purpose
Assistants (Conductors) on the basis of written examination and
interview conducted in the year 2003 and 2004 by the respondent-
Corporation. The prayer has also been made for consequential relief.
3. The claim of the petitioner(s) has been contested by the
respondents-Corporation.
4. The question as raised in the instant petition has already
been adjudicated upon by a Division Bench of this Court vide
judgment dated 11.03.2025 passed in CWP No. 3744 of 2019, titled as
Jai Kumar and others vs. HRTC and others.
5. In view of the adjudication so made, this Court is bound
by the same and for such reason no different orders can be passed in
these petitions.
6. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in the light of
what has been held by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment
dated 11.03.2025, passed in CWP No. 3744 of 2019, titled as Jai
Kumar and others vs. HRTC and others. The reasons given in said
( 2025:HHC:13248 )
judgment shall apply mutatis mutandis to the facts of the instant
petition. Petitions are accordingly, disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) th 07 May, 2025 Judge (veena)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!