Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 533 HP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
2025:HHC:12813
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.7391 of 2025
Date of Decision: 06.05.2025
_____________________________________________________________________
Surender Kumar .........Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. .......Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan
Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma,
Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi
Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents-State.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the
following main reliefs:
"(i) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus, order or directions to the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner w.e.f. the date when the Petitioner has completed their two years' service on contract basis, and also grant the benefit of High stage of Pay of 37,600 being a covered matter by the law laid down by this Hon'ble Court vide judgment dated 29.11.2024 (Annexure-P/5) in CW.P. No. 1638 of 2024 titled as Mohit Sharma & Others Vs State of HP & Others whereby it has to be held that incumbents are entitled to the benefit of higher stage of pay under Rule 7(A) of the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) First Amendment Rules, 2022, notified on 06.09.2022, on completion of two years of regular service.
(ii) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to Grant Higher Stage of Pay in the Concerned Level of Pay Matrix i.e. Rs.
40,100/-and fix their pay from due date i.e. after completion two years of regular service with all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest @ 9%."
2. Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be
received, learned counsel representing the petitioner, while inviting
attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this
Court in CWP No. 1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the
instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench
this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be
content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents
to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of aforesaid
judgment in a time bound manner.
3. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr.
Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he is
not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the
petitioner and representation, if any, filed by the petitioner shall be
considered and decided expeditiously.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without
going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present
petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the
representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-6) in light of Mohit
Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four
weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned,
while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass appropriate
orders thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
May 06, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!