Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 353 HP
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Decided on: 02.05.2025
1. CWP No. 7224/2025
Manish Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 7226/2025
Vijay Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 7228/2025
Tanika Devi & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. ........................................................................................... Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate.
For the respondent(s): Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate
General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s).
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of
almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted
from CWP No.7224/2025:-
"(i) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus order or directions directing the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioners w.e.f. the date when the Petitioners have completed their two years service on contract basis i.e. from the date, the Regularization Policy was liberalized, along with all consequential benefits, including the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2022 and the petitioners be accorded the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 after taking into account the services rendered by them on contract basis as having been appointed prior to 03.01.2022, as has been approved by the Cabinet on 14.10.2022.
(b) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to extend the benefits of the Notifications dated 03.01.2022 & 06.09.2022 and Grant Higher Stage of Pay in the Concerned Level of Pay Matrix i.e. Rs. 37,600/- as per Notification dated 06.09.2022 and fix their pay from due date i.e. after completion two years of regular service with all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest @ 9%."
3. According to the petitione(s), the legal issue involved in
the case has already been adjudicated upon. The grievance of the
petitioner(s) is that their representations, annexed with the respective
petitions, have still not been decided by the respondents/competent
authority.
4. Once the legal principle involved in the adjudication of
present petition has already been decided, it is expected from the
welfare State to consider and decide the representation of the
aggrieved employee within a reasonable time and not to sit over the
same indefinitely compelling the employee to come to the Court for
redresssal of his grievances. This is also the purport and object of the
Litigation Policy of the State. Not taking decision on the
representation for months together would not only give rise to
unnecessary multiplication of the litigation but would also bring in
otherwise avoidable increase to the Court docket on unproductive
government induced litigation.
5. In view of above, the instant petitions are disposed of by
directing respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the
aforesaid representations of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law
within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also
communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous
application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 2nd May, 2025(rohit)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!