Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 241 HP
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7090 of 2025 Decided on: 1st May, 2025
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dina Nath .....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others .....Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. V.S.Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner seeks benefits of the decision rendered
in Satya Devi Versus State of H.P. and others 2.
2. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that
the judgment in Satya Devi's2 case has been assailed by the
respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil)
No.20496/2024. The common decision passed in several
other matters connected with Satya Devi's2 case has also
been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special
Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 28.05.2024
Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh &
Ors. Vs. Inder Pal3. Copy of an order passed by the Hon'ble
Apex Court on 24.03.2025 in several connected Special Leave
Petitions with lead case State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Vs. Inder Pal3 has been perused, which reads as under:-
"1. Delay condoned.
2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters.
3. Tag alongwith SLP(C) No.20496/2024.
4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed."
In view of the fact that operation of impugned
order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28.05.2024) in all
connected Special Leave Petitions has been stayed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court, this writ petition is disposed of with
direction that benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner under
Satya Devi's2 case, shall abide by the outcome of the Inder
Pal's3 case instituted by the respondents against the common
judgment rendered in Satya Devi's2 case. Pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed
of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
May 1, 2025 Judge
R.Atal
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.11306/2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!