Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Prime Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd vs State Of H.P And Another
2025 Latest Caselaw 166 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 166 HP
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

M/S Prime Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd vs State Of H.P And Another on 1 May, 2025

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Sushil Kukreja
                                                                                     ( 2025:HHC:12143-DB )



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
                                                       CWP No.616 of 2025
                                                    Decided on: 1st May, 2025

        M/s Prime Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd.                                    .......Petitioner


                                                     versus


        State of H.P and another                                                ...Respondents
        Coram
        The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
        The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
        Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
        For the petitioner:                         Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior
                                                    Advocate with Mr.Manik Sethi,
                                                    Advocate.
        For the respondents:                        Mr.Navlesh Verma, Addl. A.G
                                                    and Ms.Sharmila Patial, Addl.
                                                    A.G. for respondent No.1.
                                                    Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Senior
                                                    Advocate with Ms.Aastha Kohli,
                                                    Advocate for respondent No.2.

        Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

The petitioner being aggrieved by the initiation of

parallel proceedings by respondent No.1 as well as respondent

No.2 by virtue of notice issued under Section 70 of the Central

Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, has approached this Court

by filing the instant petition for grant of the following

substantive relief:-

1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

( 2025:HHC:12143-DB )

"A) A writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to quash and set aside the summons dated 13.12.2024 (Annexure P-8), issued by the Respondent no. 2 and consequential action of blocking the credit ledger of the petitioner on 01.01.2025 on the GST Portal on dated 01.01.2025 (Annexure P-10) & 06.01.2025 (Annexure P-14) as the same are without jurisdiction and in the teeth of Section 6(2)(b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017."

2. On 17.03.2025, the Court passed the following

order:-

"Even though the State has filed instructions dated 15.3.2025, however we are of the considered view that the stand of the respondent-State must be reflected on affidavit. Therefore, necessary affidavit be filed within two weeks.

List on 10.4.2025. In the meanwhile, reply on behalf of respondent No.2 be also filed."

3. In compliance to the aforesaid orders, respondent

No.1 has filed affidavit, wherein it is averred that the

summon/notice had been issued to the petitioner on

03.08.2021 by the Assistant Commissioner State Taxes and

Excise-cum-proper Officer, to which, the petitioner had

submitted its reply on 17.08.2021. It is further averred that in

the instant case, respondent No.2 had initiated the proceedings

against the petitioner much later than the proceedings initiated

by respondent No.1. Accordingly, respondent No.1 has ( 2025:HHC:12143-DB )

submitted that petitioner be directed to let respondent No.1

conclude the proceedings under the CGST/HPGST Rules, 2017.

4. The record reveals that respondent No.2 i.e. Senior

Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit has now

transferred the proceedings and the same are pending before

the 1st respondent, as is evident from letter dated 24.04.2025,

which reads thus:-

"In continuation to this office letter No. 6533 dated, 15th March, 2025 on the above. In this context, it is submitted that the instant case has already been transferred to this office by the Respondent No. 2 i.e. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI Meerut Zonal Unit, Ground Floor, Opp. Saheed Park, Delhi Road, Meerut vide letter No.DGGI/INV/GST/2295/2021/Pt IV/4910 dated 28.02.2025 (copy enclosed)."

5. Since the proceedings now stand transferred by

respondent No.2 to respondent No.1, the instant petition has

achieved its purpose and is disposed of accordingly.

6. As regards the 'blocked credit ledger', learned

counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions, submits that the

same stands unblocked and such averments has specifically

been made in para 3 of the reply. The relevant portion thereof

reads as under:-

"Further, communication dated 23.12.2024 received from the petitioner, was considered and its investigation has already been transferred to respondent No.1 and unblocked the Input Tax Credit."

( 2025:HHC:12143-DB )

7. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid

terms, so also the pending applications, if any.



                                        ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan )
                                                  Judge

May 01, 2025                               ( Sushil Kukreja )
      (naveen)                                    Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter