Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hppcl And Another vs Daulat Ram And Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 1339 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1339 HP
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Hppcl And Another vs Daulat Ram And Others on 1 July, 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RFA No.383/2018 a/w Cross objections No. 03 of 2019 and connected matter Date of Decision: 01 st July 2025.

.

1. RFA No. 383 of 2018 a/w Cross objections No. 03 of 2019

HPPCL and another .....Appellants.

Versus

Daulat Ram and others .....Respondents.

2. RFA No. 393 of 2018 a/w cross objections No. 19 of 2019

HPPCL and another .....Appellants.

Versus

Daulat Ram and others .....Respondents

____________________________________________________ Coram

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate in RFA No.383 of 2018 and Mr.

Vikas Mishra, Advocate, in RFA No. 393 of 2018.

For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1 in both the appeals-cross objector.

                                   :           Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate
                                               General,       for     proforma





                                               respondents No. 2 & 3.


             Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral).

Since both the above captioned appeals are directed

against the award(s) dated 5.9.2018 & 09.08.2018 passed, in

Reference Petition No.35-LAC/4 of 2015 and 15-LAC/4 of 2015

respectively, alongwith other connected matters, by learned District

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES

Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, the same are being taken up

together for adjudication with the consent of learned counsel

representing the parties.

.

2. By way of aforesaid appeals filed under Section 54 of the

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act),

challenge has been laid to award(s) dated 05.9.2018 & 9.8.2018

passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, in

various Land Reference petitions as described in the award.

3. Undisputedly, the suit land belonging to claimant(s), situate

in Mohal Jaincha Majhai, Sub Tehsil Dadahu, District Sirnmaur,

H.P., as detailed in the award(s), came to be acquired for public

purpose; namely; construction of "Renuka Ji Dam and its

submergence area" and acquisition proceedings commenced with

the issuance of Notifications under Section 4 of the Act on

24.07.2009 and 20.11.2008 respectively. The Land Acquisition

Collector (for short 'LAC') passed common award(s) Nos.703 &

704, dated 01.10.2012 and awarded compensation of the acquired

land as per the classification and nature of the land mentioned in

the award.

4. Claimants, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the

amount of compensation awarded by 'LAC', preferred reference

petitions under Section 18 of the Act, before the learned District

Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, seeking therein enhancement of

compensation, awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector. Learned

District Judge vide impugned award(s) dated 5.9.2018, 9.18.2018,

redetermined the market value of the acquired land and enhanced

the same at the rate of Rs.7,00,000/- per bigha irrespective of

.

nature and classification of land alongwith all statutory benefits as

mentioned in the award.

5. The appellants being aggrieved and dis-satisfied with the

aforesaid award(s) passed by the learned District Judge, Sirmaur

District at Nahan, have approached this Court by way of above

captioned appeals, seeking therein to reduce the award(s) passed

by the learned District Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan.

6. It is not in dispute before this Court that similar situate

claimants, whose land also came to be acquired for construction of

"Renuka Ji Dam and its submergence area" in the acquisition

proceedings commenced with the publication of Notification issued

under Section 4 of the Act, had filed land reference petitions before

the learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, praying

therein to enhance the compensation awarded by 'LAC' in its

awards No.703 & 704, dated 01.10.2012. Those reference petitions

were clubbed and disposed of by common award(s) passed in

Reference Petition No.35-LAC/4 of 2015, dated 05.09.2018,

alongwith other connected matters and Reference Petition No.15-

LAC/4 of 2015, dated 09.08.2018, alongwith other connected

matters, wherein the Reference Court re-determined the market

value of entire land irrespective of classification and nature of the

land on uniform basis and awarded a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- per

bigha.

7. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid award

.

passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, the

respondents in the aforesaid reference petitions, filed different

appeals, which came to be disposed of by a Coordinate Bench of

this Court vide judgment dated 09.12.2019 passed in RFA No.171

of 2016, titled as: LAC, HPPCL & Anr. vs. Kamal Dev & Ors.,

(for short "Kamal Dev's case") by holding that Reference Court

has rightly determined the enhanced market value of land at the

rate of Rs.7,00,000/- per bigha, irrespective of nature and

classification of land in its award(s) dated 05.9.2018 & 9.8.2018,

respectively.

8. S/Shri Shashi Shirshoo and Vikas Mishra, learned counsel,

representing the appellants in respective appeals, while fairly

acknowledging the factum with regard to passing of judgment dated

09.12.2019 in "Kamal Dev's case" (supra), conceded that

claimants-respondents in the case(s) at hand are also entitled for

compensation at the rate of Rs.7,00,000/- per bigha irrespective of

nature and classification of land as per the said judgment. Shri Ajay

Chauhan, learned counsel representing the claimants respondents

in respective cases, also acceded to the market value of the land

determined in "Kamal Dev's case" (supra).

9. Consequently, in view of detailed discussion

madehereinabove as well as fair stand adopted by S/Shri Shashi

Shirshoo and Vikas Mishra, learned counsel representing the

.

appellants, present appeals are dismissed and it is ordered that

directions contained in "Kamal Dev's case" (supra), shall mutatis

mutandis apply to the present cases also. Interim order, if any, is

vacated.

10. Appellants are directed to deposit the entire award

amount in the Registry of this Court within a period of eight weeks

from today, if not already deposited.

11. In view of the aforesaid, cross objections bearing No.03 of

2019 filed in RFA No. 383 of 2018 and cross objections bearing

No.19 of 2019 filed in RFA No. 393 of 2018 also stand disposed of.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand

disposed of.

(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge

01st July, 2025 (Tarun)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter