Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13795 HP
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 7696 of 2024
Decided on: 12.09.2024
____________________________________________________
Anil Kumar
........... petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others .........respondents
.
_______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocate General.
________________________________________________________
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
In the case at hand, the writ of mandamus is being
sought by the present petitioner. The basic requirement for issuance of
a writ of mandamus is that there should be a demand raised before the
concerned respondent-authority with respect to redressal of grievances
being raised in the present petition.
2. Admittedly in the case at hand, no representation qua
grievances being raised in the present petition has been made to the
concerned quarter.
3. In view thereof, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation
qua grievances being raised in the present petition before the
concerned authority within a period of two weeks from today.
In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of, so
also, pending miscellaneous application, if any.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
September 12, 2024 tarun
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!