Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prince Rani vs State Of H.P. & Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 5129 HP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5129 HP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Prince Rani vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 6 May, 2024

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                   Cr. MP(M) No. 941 of 2024
                                  Date of Decision: 06.05.2024
         _____________________________________________________________




                                                                                       .
         Prince          Rani                                               ...Petitioner...





                                              Versus





         State of H.P. & Anr.                                                 ...Respondents...

        Coram
        Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
        Whether approved for reporting?1





        For the petitioner:                Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate.
        For the respondents:    Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
                                for respondent No.1/State.
    4._________________________________________________________

        Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)

{{

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 of the

Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.12 of 2024 dated

20.04.2024, registered at Women Police Station Una, District Una, HP,

under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO

Act and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act.

2. In the bail application, it has been averred that the victim is about 17

years. The mother of the victim is running a tailor shop at Amb Bazzar. At

the said shop, the victim also helps her mother.

3. The petitioner is stated to be working in a nearby shop. The

petitioner is aged 24 years. On account of proximity of shops, where the

petitioner works and the tailor shop being run by the mother of the victim,

the petitioner has got acquainted with the victim.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

4. The petitioner is alleged to have been sexually assaulting the victim

for the last three years. The victim was under a threat from the petitioner

.

qua disclosure of the physical relationship with the petitioner. The

petitioner is also alleged to have taken some unwarranted photographs of

the victim. Even on this account, the victim was under a threat and

therefore, did not disclose the aforementioned facts to her mother.

5. From the aforementioned facts and attending circumstances, it is

evident that sexual assault on a minor victim in the case at hand

commenced, when the victim was about 14 years of age. A perusal of

Section 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012 reveals that in so far offence under

Section 3 for which, punishment has been prescribed in Section 4 is

concerned, there is a presumption that a person has committed the

offence unless the contrary is proved.

6. Nothing in the bail application has been averred qua the petitioner

being falsely implicated in the case at hand. Nor has any argument been

raised in this respect, besides the aforesaid, neither has it been averred or

argued that the present FIR has been lodged with the object of injuring

and humiliating the present bail applicant.

7. The nature and seriousness of the allegations made against the

petitioner, the context of the events likely to lead to the making of the

allegations and the fact that the petitioner is not a resident of the State of

Himachal Pradesh, not only raises a reasonable possibility of the

applicant's presence being not secured but also raises a reasonable

apprehension that witnesses will be tampered.

8. Even otherwise, the FIR in the case at hand has been registered on

20.04.2024. Investigation would, therefore, be at a nascent stage. For the

.

foregoing reasons, present application is rejected.

9. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed and disposed of.






                                                (Bipin Chander Negi)
                                                       Judge
May 06, 2024
  (Gaurav)




                         r            to















                                .














 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter