Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5096 HP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3593 of 2024
Decided on: 06.05.2024
.
Kamla Devi ... Petitioner
Versus
Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar
Himachal Pradesh Krishi
Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur & another ... Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes
_____________________________________________________
For the petitioner : Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia,
prayed for the following relief:-
"a) That the respondents may be directed to allow the petitioner to get the family pension of her deceased
husband after switching over from "CPF-cum-Gratuity
Scheme" to "GPF-cum-Pension-cum- Gratuity Scheme" and allot her the GPF Account Number on the basis of
judgment dated 17.04.2023 in LPA No.46/23 vide Annexure P-5 and respondents may kindly be ordered to consider the case of the petitioner within a time bound period manner with all consequential benefits."
2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this
Court is of the considered view that the present Writ petition is not
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
maintainable.
3. The petitioner happens to be the widow of late Shri
.
Dhani Ram. Late Shri Dhani Ram was an employee of the
respondent-University. He superannuated in the year 2006 from the
post of beldar. He died in the year 2022. During his life time, Shri
Dhani Ram never raised the issue of switching over from CPF-cum-
Gratuity Scheme to GPF-pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme. That being
the case, after the death of Shri Dhani Ram, the widow of Shri
Dhani Ram is entitled for the family pension which flows from
whatever scheme had been consented to by late husband of the
petitioner for the purpose of receiving pension.
4. This Court is of the considered view that the issue of
switching from one Pension Scheme to another Pension Scheme was
a matter personal to late husband of the petitioner and the petitioner
cannot be permitted to enter into his foot steps for praying this kind
of a relief.
5. This Court is not oblivious to the fact that the petitioner
happens to be the widow of late employee of the respondent-
University, but fact of the matter remains that her only right after
the demise of her husband is to receive family pension and it is not
her case that family pension is not being paid to her in terms of the
pensionary scheme etc., on the basis of which the deceased husband
of the petitioner was granted post retiral benefits.
6. Therefore, as this Court is of the considered view that
.
the present petition is not maintainable, the same is dismissed, so
also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 06, 2024
(Rishi)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!