Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10447 HP
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. RevisionNo. 36 of 2013
Date of Decision: 26.07.2024
Jahid Ali Ansari ... petitioner
Versus
.
State of H.P. ....Respondent
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the petitioner : Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional
Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral)
The copy of the application made for the post
mortem examination of the deceased-Jahid Ali Ansari has been
filed, which shows that the petitioner has died. Hence, the
petition has abated qua petitioner and is dismissed as abated.
2. In view of the above, the present petition is
dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 26th July, 2024 (saurav pathania)
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!