Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10985 HP
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7682 of 2024 Date of decision: 02.08.2024
.
Rajmal. ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional r Advocate General, for respondents-State.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
The contents of the petition do not match with the
relief prayed for, and there is no co-relation between the
main relief prayed for in the petition and the documents
placed on record.
2. Confronted with the above, learned counsel for
the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present
petition with liberty to file afresh after incorporating proper
particulars, grounds, prayer and documents. The prayer is
accepted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,
shall also stand disposed of.
.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
2nd August, 2024 Judge
(Pardeep)
r to
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!