Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15189 HP
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 7147 of 2023
Decided on: October 3, 2023
________________________________________________________
Rajeev Kumar ........... Petitioner
.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another .... Respondents
________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents :
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar
and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ravi
Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):
By way of instant petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution
of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following main reliefs:
"That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on completion
of 3 years continuous contractual service from the due date i.e. January, 2018 in terms of regularisation policy and in terms of judgment dated 31.08.2022 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CWP No.
342/2021 titled as Yashwant Singh & others v/s State of H.P. & others
alongwith other connected matters (Annexure P-1), with all consequential benefits including seniority from the due date."
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the issue
raised in the instant petition has been settled by this court in Yashwant
Singh and others v. The State of Himachal Pradesh and another,
CWP No. 342 of 2021 decided on 31.8.2022.
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
3. In view of aforesaid fair stand adopted by learned counsel for
the parties, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of
.
Yashwant Singh supra, within a period of four weeks. Needless to
say, authority concerned shall afford opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner and pass a speaking order thereafter. Liberty is reserved to
the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law,
if he still remains aggrieved.
All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
October 3, 2023
Vikrant
r to (Sandeep Sharma)
Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!