Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8898 HP
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2022
Sunita Rana vs. Rajneesh
.
COPC (T) No.33 of 2022
31.10.2022 Present Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Narender Guleria, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
While placing on record communication dated 28th
October 2022, issued under the Signature of Director Elementary
Education, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General
states that the matter is under active consideration of the Government.
Bare perusal of aforesaid communication, which is taken on record,
reveals that department having processed the case at various levels,
referred the same to the Government. Though, excuse rendered by the
Government in the aforesaid communication is not sufficient to accede
the request made by learned Additional Advocate General for an
adjournment because till the time judgment alleged to have been
violated is not stayed by Hon'ble Apex Court, respondents have no
option but to implement the same. However, by way of indulgence last
opportunity of four weeks is granted to the respondents to comply with
the judgment, failing which, respondents shall remain present in Court
to explain as why contempt proceedings be not initiated against them
for their having willfully and intentionally disobeyed the directions
contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated.
List on 30.11.2022.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge 31st October, 2022 (shankar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!