Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11822 HP
Judgement Date : 30 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 6449 of 2020
Decided on: December 30, 2022
________________________________________________________
.
Rajinder Parkash and others .........Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others ...Respondents
________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1?
________________________________________________________
For the petitioners: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Narinder Guleria, Additional Advocate
General with Mr. Sunny Datwalia,
Assistant Advocate General.
________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly admits that with the
afflux of time, majority of the reliefs, as claimed by the petitioners in the
instant petition, stand granted but only issue with regard to re-
designation of post of Junior Accountant to Accountant is hanging in
fire. He states that at present, no post of Junior Account exists in any
Government department in the State of Himachal Pradesh, as such,
decision is required to be taken by the respondents in the case at hand
at the earliest.
2. Perusal of reply to the petition filed by the respondents, itself
reveals that the matter regarding re-designation of Junior Account to
Accountant is under consideration of Advisory Department. Reply was
filed on 4.7.2022 under the signatures of Joint Secretary (PR) to the
Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? .
Government of Himachal Pradesh. Sine more than five months have
passed after filing of reply, this court hopes and trusts that needful shall
.
be done expeditiously by the respondents.
3. In view of above, present petition is disposed of with a
direction to the respondents. to take a decision with respect to re-
designation of the post of Junior Accountant in Panchayati Raj
Department, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks.
Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach this court again if they
still remain aggrieved.
4.
The petition stands disposed of in the afore terms, alongwith
all pending applications.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge December 30, 2022
(Vikrant)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!