Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4914 HP
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
ON THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (MAIN) U/S 482 CRPC
No.325 of 2021
Between:
MANISH ROHTA, S/O SH.
DEVI SINGH ROHTA, R/O
VILLAGE AND P.O. BAGHI,
TEHSIL KOTKHAI,
DISTRICT SHIMLA,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
r ....PETITIONER.
(BY MR.SARTHAK MEHTA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH, THROUGH
INVESTIGATING OFFICER,
POLICE STATION DHALLI,
DISTRICT SHIMLA,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
2. MRS. RACHNA CHANDEL,
W/O SHRI PAWAN PIRTA,
D/O SHRI CHET RAM
CHANDEL, R/O VILLAGE
KUFAR, P.O. BAGRI, TEHSIL
THEOG, DISTRICT SHIMLA,
HIMACHAL PRADESH, ALSO
R/O OM LAXMI BHAWAN
KAMLANAGAR,
P.O.KAMLANAGAR, TEHSIL
AND DISTRICT SHIMLA,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
....RESPONDENTS.
(BY SHRI ADARSH SHARMA, SHRI SUMESH RAJ AND SHRI
SANJEEV SOOD, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATES GENERAL, With
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:10:26 :::CIS
2
MR. KAMAL KANT CHANDEL, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL,
FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.1.
MR. SAURAV RATTAN, ADVOCATE, FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court passed the
following:
JUDGMENT
Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate has put in appearance on
behalf of respondent No.2.
By way of this petition, filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prayed for quashing
of FIR No.238 of 2019, dated 17.12.2019, registered under Sections
376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dhalli,
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Additional
Advocate General.
3. Respondent No.2 (Mrs. Rachna Chandel), who is present
in Court, has been duly identified by her counsel Mr.Saurav Rattan,
Advocate. Her statement has also been independently recorded in
the Court, wherein she has stated that she has entered into a
compromise with the petitioner/accused and she is not interested in
pursuing the matter which led to registration of FIR No.238 of 2019,
dated 17.12.2019, registered under Sections 376 and 506 of the
Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dhalli, District Shimla,
Himachal Pradesh. A copy of the Compromise Deed so arrived at
between the parties is appended with the petition as Annexure P-2
and execution of the same as also the contents thereof have also
been acknowledged by respondent No.2.
.
4. Learned Additional Advocate General has also very fairly
submitted that the respondent-State has no objection in case this
petition is allowed and FIR in issue is quashed and set aside.
5. Accordingly, in view of above, this petition is allowed
and FIR No.238 of 2019, dated 17.12.2019, registered under
Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station
Dhalli, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, as well as ensuing
criminal proceedings against the petitioner, are quashed and set
aside, taking into consideration the compromise entered between the
complainant i.e. respondent No.2 and accused and statement to this
effect, made by respondent No.2 in this Court. The Compromise
Deed Annexure P-2 as well as statement of the complainant made
today in the Court shall form part of the judgment. Miscellaneously
applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
October 05, 2021 (Ajay Mohan Goel)
(rishi) Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!