Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1233 HP
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021
CMP No. 353 of 2021 in RFA No. 146 of 2016
24.2.2021 Present: Ms.Parul Sarta, Advocate, vice Mr.Kuldeep Singh
.
Rathour, Advocate, for non-applicant/appellant.
Mr.Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for applicants/respondent No. 1 and Legal Heirs of respondent No. 2.
Mr.R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for non- applicants/respondents No. 3 and 4.
This application has been filed for release of
amount of compensation in favour of respondent No. 1 and
legal heirs of respondent No. 2 Ranbir Singh.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants
that Reference Court vide judgment dated 10.4.2015 had
determined the amount of compensation payable to claimants.
The said award was assailed by the appellant by filing RFA No.
146 of 2016, which was allowed on 13.9.2018 and the Land
Reference Petition was remanded to Reference Court for
deciding afresh. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
applicants/claimants that after remand, Reference Court vide
award dated 2.9.2019, copy whereof has been placed on
record with this application, has decided the Reference Petition
and has maintained the amount of compensation as
determined by the Reference Court in earlier award. According
to him, no appeal has been preferred by the appellant against
the said award dated 2.9.2019.
Learned vice counsel appearing under instructions
of original counsel for non-applicant/applicant, has pleaded no
instructions.
Learned counsel for the applicants/claimants
submits that respondent No. 2 had died during pendency of
.
Reference Petition, after remand, before the Reference Court,
which is evident from the copy of award dated 2.9.2019 placed
on record with this application. He further submits that till date
no notice has been received by applicants/claimants, so as to
construe that non-applicant/appellant has assailed the award
dated 2.9.2019.
r It is further submitted by learned counsel for the
applicants/claimants that 50% of awarded amount already
stands released during pendency of RFA No. 146 of 2016 in
favour of Chain Singh and Ranbir Singh.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances,
balance amount for which applicants/claimants are entitled in
terms of award dated 2.9.2019, be released in their favour,
along with up to date interest, by remitting the same in their
respective bank accounts, mentioned in para 8 of the
application.
It is made clear that in case it is found that
applicants/claimants have received excess amount, they shall
be liable to refund the same to non-applicant/appellant along
with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
24th February, 2021 (Keshav)
.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!