Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shankarbhai Jitendrabhai Salat vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3498 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3498 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shankarbhai Jitendrabhai Salat vs State Of Gujarat on 13 May, 2026

                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/11455/2026                               ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

                                                                                                          undefined




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR
                            BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 11455 of 2026

                      ==================================================
                                  SHANKARBHAI JITENDRABHAI SALAT
                                                Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR VICKY B MEHTA(5422) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS. JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==================================================

                       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                             DESAI

                                                        Date : 13/05/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging

the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being

C.R. No. 11209016260240 of 2026 registered with

Himmatnagar A Division Police Station, Dist. Sabarkantha for

the offence punishable under Sections 8(C), 20(b) 29 of the

NDPS Act

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation leveled, the applicant may be enlarged on

regular bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet

is filed, further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit

the Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended

that, the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the

conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if released on

bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected

to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the

present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this

Court may not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant

and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the charge-sheet papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Himatnagar, dist. Sabarkantha, hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents;

iii. The investigation being over and charge-sheet having been filed;

iv. As per the prosecution case, the alleged contraband ganja, weighing about 6 kg 413 grams, was found from the applicant's house, and he had purchased the said contraband ganja from the co-accused Havlabhai alias Savabhai and Bharmabhai alias Bharatbhai.

v. Further, as per the prosecution case, it were the absconding accused, Dhaniben and Kantibhai, who had purchased the said contraband ganja from the co-accused i.e. Havlabhai alias Savabhai and Bharmabhai alias Bharatbhai and had brought the same to the house of the present applicant.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

vi. The apprehension of the learned APP, as regards the non- availability of the applicant during the trial can be put to rest by imposing stringent condition;

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1

SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against the

applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion

that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge

the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant

is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R.

registered as C.R. No. 11209016260240 of 2026 registered with

Himmatnagar A Division Police Station, Dist. Sabarkantha, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the

satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that

he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the geographical limits of Himmatnagar, Dist.

Sabarkantha without prior permission of the Court

concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O.

and to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and

shall not change his residence without prior intimation to

the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Sunday before the concerned

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

police station, till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for

which, he shall file an affidavit before the concerned court

and the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is

not required in connection with any other offence for the time

being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,

the Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above

conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11455/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) PARMAR CHIRAG

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter