Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajendrakumar Sohanlal Bhaat vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3496 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3496 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rajendrakumar Sohanlal Bhaat vs State Of Gujarat on 13 May, 2026

                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/11575/2026                             ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

                                                                                                         undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                                       CHARGESHEET) NO. 11575 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                        RAJENDRAKUMAR SOHANLAL BHAAT & ANR.
                                                       Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR HB CHAMPAVAT(6149) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
                      MR KIRITSINH M SISODIA(12255) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS. JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                       Date : 13/05/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicants and learned APP appearing on behalf of the

respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicants have filed this application under Section 483

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11204028260192 of 2026 registered with Kapadwanj Rural Police

Station, Kheda, for the offence punishable under Sections 67A,

65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11575/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

Act, 1949.

4. Learned advocate for the applicants would submit that

considering the role attributed to the applicants, and nature of

the allegation leveled, the applicants may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that, no useful purpose would be

served by keeping the applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is

further contended that, the applicants are ready and willing to

abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if

released on bail. Learned advocate for the applicants has

submitted that, the applicants shall not leave the State of Gujarat

till the trial is over.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking

to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicants, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of

the applicants and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the chargesheet papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11575/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

i. The applicants though are the permanent residents of

Rajasthan, shall not leave the State of Gujarat, hence would

be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant no. 1 is the driver of the truck and applicant

no. 2 is the cleaner of the truck from wherein, the

consignment of illicit liquor was seized by the Police, while

they were transporting the same.

iii. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents.

iv. The apprehension of the learned APP, as regards the non-

availability of the applicants during the trial can be put to rest

by imposing stringent condition.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.

Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

the nature of the allegations made against the applicants in the

First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11575/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit

case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicants on

regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicants

are ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being

C.R. No. 11204028260192 of 2026 registered with Kapadwanj

Rural Police Station, Kheda, on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with one local surety

each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and

subject to the conditions that they shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of their liberty or misuse their

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender their respective passports, if any, to the trial

court within a week, and if they do not possess any passport,

they shall file individual affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the geographical limits of State of Gujarat

without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11575/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

[e] furnish the present address of their respective

residences in Gujarat to the I.O. and the Court at the time of

execution of the bond along with documentary proof and shall

not change their residence without prior intimation to the I.O.

and the court;

[f] shall mark their presence on every Monday (Applicant

no.1) and on every Tuesday (Applicant no.2) before the

concerned police station, till the trial is over;

9. The Authorities will release the applicants only if they are

not required in connection with any other offence for the time

being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the

Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bonds to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions

in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11575/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of

considering the application of the applicants for being released

on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANIRUDH OJHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter