Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahul S/O. Kailashbhai Popatbhai ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3492 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3492 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rahul S/O. Kailashbhai Popatbhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 13 May, 2026

                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/11518/2026                              ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

                                                                                                        undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
                                   AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 11518 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                     RAHUL S/O. KAILASHBHAI POPATBHAI DOBARIYA
                                                        Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR RUTVIJ S OZA(5594) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR UMANG R VYAS(5595) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS. JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                       Date : 13/05/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on

behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11214023260192 of 2026 registered with Kadodara GIDC Police

Station, Surat Rural for the offence punishable under Sections

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11518/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

303(2), 316(3), 317(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of the BNS,

2023.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation leveled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,

further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that,

the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions

that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking

to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may

not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the charge-sheet papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11518/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Junagadh district,

hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents;

iii. The investigation has been over and charge-sheet has been

filed;

iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant's father

Kailashbhai Dobariya who is also a co-accused, had rented a

premises from where he would contact drivers passing

through the highway, purchase chemicals from them at a

lower price and store the same in the said premises, and

thereafter, sell the stolen chemicals from such tankers to

other purchasers;

v. The apprehension of the learned APP, as regards the non-

availability of the applicant during the trial can be put to

rest by imposing stringent condition;

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.

Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11518/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the

First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in

detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit

case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on

regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No. 11214023260192 of 2026 registered with Kadodara

GIDC Police Station, Surat Rural, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and

subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the geographical limits of District Junagadh

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11518/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

without prior permission of the Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and

to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and

the court;

[f] mark presence on every Sunday before the concerned

police station, till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for

which, he shall file an affidavit before the concerned court and

the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the

Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11518/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/05/2026

undefined

in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANIRUDH OJHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter