Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahulbhai S/O Rameshbhai @Bhimjibhai ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3448 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3448 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rahulbhai S/O Rameshbhai @Bhimjibhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 12 May, 2026

                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/10846/2026                               ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

                                                                                                         undefined




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL -
                               AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 10846 of 2026
                      ==================================================
                              RAHULBHAI S/O RAMESHBHAI @BHIMJIBHAI
                        ZAPADIYA(NAME AS PER ORDER OF LD. SESIONS COURT)
                                               Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR LAXMANSINH M ZALA(5787) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR MOHITSINH A JADEJA(13111) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      MS. JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==================================================
                       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                              DESAI

                                                        Date : 12/05/2026
                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging

them on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11211031250488 of 2025 registered with Limdi Police Station,

Surendranagar for the offence punishable under Sections 108,

80(2) of the BNS, 2023 and under Sections 3, 7 of the Dowry

Prohibition Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on

regular bail. It is further submitted that, the applicant is ready

and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed

by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected

to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that

looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the

present applicant, this Court may not exercise discretion in

favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

5.1 Learned advocate Mr. Mohitsinh Jadeja appears for the

original complainant. He has already filed his vakalatnama in

the Registry. Learned advocate for the original complainant

places on record the affidavit filed by the original complainant

Mr. Babubhai Mathurbhai Mer, and submits that, the dispute

between the applicant and the original complainant has been

amicably settled. The applicant is present before the Court and

has affirmed the averments made in the affidavit.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Surendranagar

hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The investigation being over, charge sheet has been filed;

iii. The applicant has no criminal antecedents;

iv. The original complainant Mr.Babubhai Mathurbhai Mer

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

has filed an affidavit, wherein, he has stated that, the

dispute between him and the Applicant has been resolved

and that, a settlement has been arrived at and, as such, he

has no objection if bail is granted to the applicant, who is

his son-in-law.

v. The original complainant is present before the court and

he has affirmed the facts of his affidavit;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1

SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against the

applicants in the First Information Report, without discussing

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion

that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge

the applicants on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant

is ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being

C.R. No. 11211031250488 of 2025 registered with Limdi Police

Station, Surendranagar, on each executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one

surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial

Court and subject to the conditions that they shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave State of Gujarat without prior permission of

the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of their residence to the I.O.

and to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

shall not change his residence without prior intimation to

the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence on every Sunday before the concerned

police station till the trial is over;

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is

not required in connection with any other offence for the time

being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,

the Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above

conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail. The application is

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10846/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the

aforesaid extent.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) PARMAR CHIRAG

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter