Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhishek Ashokkumar Suthar vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3440 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3440 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Abhishek Ashokkumar Suthar vs State Of Gujarat on 12 May, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/8161/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 8161 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                                ABHISHEK ASHOKKUMAR SUTHAR
                                                            Versus
                                                      STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR SHAMBHUKUMAR(13426) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                           Date : 12/05/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Gajendra P. Baghel

appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. Jirga Jhaveri appearing

on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210062250085 of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8161/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

2025 registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Surat

for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(2),

336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and

Section 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology

(Amendment) Act, 2008.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant

is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that

may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

Learned advocate upon instructions has submitted that,

the applicant shall not leave the State of Gujarat, till

the completion of the trial. Learned advocate has further

submitted that, the original complainant has filed an

affidavit wherein, it is mentioned that, the dispute has

been resolved and he had received his money.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8161/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as

coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant though is a permanent resident of

State of Jarkhand, would be available at the time of

trial;

ii. The original complainant Shitala Prasad Dharm Raj

Singh is present before the court and he has affirmed

the contents of the affidavit, wherein, it is mentioned

that, dispute between the parties has been resolved

and he has received the money from the applicant.

iii. The apprehension of the learned APP that, the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8161/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

applicant would once again indulge in similar or such

offence, can be put to rest by imposing stringent

conditions.

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation

reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11210062250085 of 2025 with Cyber Crime Police Station,

Surat, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject

to the conditions that he shall;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8161/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of

the prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence once every week before the

concerned police station till the completion of the trial;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file an affidavit before the

concerned court and the police station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8161/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions

is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for

the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of

the above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not

be influenced by any observations of this Court which

are of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for

the purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) MAYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter