Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajaybhai Chhibubhai Halpati vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3439 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3439 Guj
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ajaybhai Chhibubhai Halpati vs State Of Gujarat on 12 May, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/10780/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                          CHARGESHEET) NO. 10780 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                                                   AJAYBHAI CHHIBUBHAI HALPATI
                                                              Versus
                                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR ADIL R MIRZA(2488) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MS JIRGA JHAVERI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 12/05/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11200018260060 of

2026 registered with Dharampur Police Station, Valsad

for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e),

81, 116(b) and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2017.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further submitted that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. As submitted by the learned advocate for the

applicant would submit that, the applicant is a

resident of Union Territory of Daman and shall be

available during the trial.

ii. The applicant has two criminal antecedents of

similar nature;

iii.The role of the applicant, as per the prosecution

case, is that he had got the Eicher Tempo bearing

registration no. MH-48-T-5532 loaded with

contraband liquor and had given it to co-accused

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

Haleshwar Sukhleshwar Hasda and Samis alias

Jhingo Ishwarbhai Dhimmar;

iv.The apprehension of learned APP, as regards the

applicant indulging in similar kind of offence, if

granted bail, can be put to rest by imposing

stringent conditions;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

9. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11200018260060 of 2026 registered with Dharampur

Police Station, Valsad, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with

one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the geographical limits of Union Territory

of Daman and Valsad district without prior permission

of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

bond and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence before the concerned police

station every alternate day till the filing of charge-

sheet and thereafter on every Monday till the

completion of trial;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned

court and the police station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10780/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/05/2026

undefined

above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail. The

application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) DIVYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter