Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayushsinh Rajendrasinh Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 3385 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3385 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ayushsinh Rajendrasinh Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat on 11 May, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/11306/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 11306 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                                  AYUSHSINH RAJENDRASINH JADEJA
                                                              Versus
                                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR N H PARMAR(11277) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR. MH SHEKHAWAT(7194) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MS JIRGA JHAVERI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                       No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 11/05/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11189004252318 of

2025 registered with 'B' Division Morbi City Police

Station, Morbi for the offence punishable under Sections

111(2)(B), 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegations levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further submitted that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the charge-sheet

papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a resident of Morbi, hence would be

available at the time of trial;

ii. Co-accused Divyarajsinh Rajendrasinh Jadeja, having

identical role as that of the applicant, has been

enlarged on regular bail by the co-ordinate bench of

this court vide order dated 08.05.2026 passed in

Criminal Misc. Application No. 11149 of 2026;

iii. The investigation being over, charge-sheet has been

filed;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

iv. The apprehension of learned APP, as regards the

applicant indulging in similar kind of offence, if

granted bail, can be put to rest by imposing stringent

conditions.

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11189004252318 of 2025 registered with 'B' Division

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

Morbi City Police Station, Morbi on executing a bail bond

of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with

one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial

Court and subject to the conditions that, he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the geographical limits of Morbi district

without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond together with documentary proof and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the

I.O. and the court;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

[f] mark his presence before the concerned police

station every alternate day for a period of one month,

and thereafter, on every Thursday till the completion of

trial;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned

court and the police station;

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law and if

circumstances, so desire.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/11306/2026 ORDER DATED: 11/05/2026

undefined

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail. The

application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) DIVYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter