Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmeshbhai Ramnikbhai Dodiya vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 891 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 891 Guj
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Dharmeshbhai Ramnikbhai Dodiya vs State Of Gujarat on 6 March, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                           NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/26690/2025                                ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026

                                                                                                            undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 26690 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                             DHARMESHBHAI RAMNIKBHAI DODIYA
                                                         Versus
                                                   STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MS.MANJULA R CHAUHAN(6871) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR L B DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                          Date : 06/03/2026
                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Ms. Manjula R. Chauhan appearing on

behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.B.

Dabhi appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on

Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11198006252069 of

2025 registered with Ghogha Road Police Station, District Bhavnagar, for

the offence punishable under Sections 75(1), 87, 352 and 351(3) of the

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/26690/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026

undefined

the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled,

the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that

since the charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose would be served by

keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended

that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that

may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant

of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of

offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from

the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of

the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. Allegation being under Sections 75(1), 87 and 352 etc. of the BNS

and whereas the allegation being that the accused, had attempted to

abduct the complainant, more particularly since the complainant was

not inclined to continue a relationship with the applicant, which she

was hitherto having.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/26690/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026

undefined

ii. Prima facie it would appear that the allegations levelled in the FIR

may not inspire much confidence.

iii. It would also appear that the allegations taken at best, would also

reflect some tiff between the complainant and the accused, who

appears to be her paramour.

iv. The fact of the complainant herself being a married lady having

two children.

v. The fact of the applicant being in custody since 12.09.2025, the

charge-sheet having been laid and the applicant not having any

antecedent whatsoever.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau

of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered

to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/26690/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026

undefined

11198006252069 of 2025 registered with Ghogha Road Police Station,

District Bhavnagar, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of

the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the

Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the

residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] not enter Bhavnagar District till the deposition of the complainant,

except for the purpose of marking presence before the concerned

police station and attending the trial.

[g] mark presence once a month for a period of six months before the

concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required

in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/26690/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026

undefined

of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will

be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction

to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify

and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any

observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this

stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant

for being released on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made

absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) BDSONGARA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter