Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abrarkhan S/O Yunuskhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2928 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2928 Guj
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Abrarkhan S/O Yunuskhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat on 29 April, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/749/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                           R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 749 of 2026

                     ==========================================================
                                          ABRARKHAN S/O YUNUSKHAN PATHAN
                                                       Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
                     ==========================================================
                     Appearance:
                     MS SHREYA OJHA(14681) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                     MR HARDIK MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                     ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                         Date : 29/04/2026
                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.I.H. Syed with learned

Advocate Ms. Shreya Ojha appearing on behalf of the applicant and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Hardik Mehta appearing on

behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on

Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191011240295 of

2024 registered with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City, for the

offence punishable under Sections 8(C), 21(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

4. Learned Senior Advocate for the applicant would submit that

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/749/2026 ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

undefined

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is

further submitted that since the charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose

would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is

further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all

the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant

of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of

offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from

the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of

the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. Allegation being that the accused had transacted in prohibited

contraband Mephedrone weighing 256 grams approximately in total.

ii. It would appear in this regard that based upon a secret information,

the Investigating Officer had raided a premises, not belonging to the

present applicant, and whereas six persons were found at the spot and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/749/2026 ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

undefined

whereas various quantities of the contraband were found with each of

the said accused, which total to 256.860 milligrams.

iii. As against the same, it would appear that from the possession of

the present applicant approximately 5.120 milligrams of the

contraband substance was recovered.

iv. While the present is stated to have 07 antecedents, yet, it would

appear that none of the antecedents are under the NDPS Act.

v. This Court has also considered the fact that the present applicant is

in custody since 20.11.2024, the charge-sheet having been laid and

since the quantity of the contraband recovered from the conscious

possession of the applicant is intermediate, the rigors of Section

37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act would not come into play.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau

of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.





                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/749/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered

to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11191011240295 of 2024 registered with D.C.B. Police Station,

Ahmedabad City, on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty

Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction

of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the InterimState of Gujarat without prior permission of

the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the

Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the

residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] mark presence once a month for a period of six months before the

concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required

in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any

of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/749/2026 ORDER DATED: 29/04/2026

undefined

be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction

to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify

and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any

observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this

stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant

for being released on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made

absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) BDSONGARA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter