Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhagwanbhai Narayanbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2838 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2838 Guj
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2026

[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Bhagwanbhai Narayanbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 28 April, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/1778/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 1778 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                             BHAGWANBHAI NARAYANBHAI PATEL
                                                         Versus
                                                   STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR. RAAJEN D JADHAV(10026) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR K J PANCHAL(2422) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      MS JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                          Date : 28/04/2026

                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Zubin F. Bharda with

learned advocate Mr. Raajen D. Jadhav appearing on

behalf of the applicant, learned advocate Mr. K. J.

Panchal appearing on behalf of the respondent - Bank

and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. Jyoti Bhatt

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11201016200007 of

2020 registered with CID Crime (Surat Zone) Police

Station, District Surat for the offences punishable under

Sections 406, 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of

Indian Penal Code.

4. Learned advocate Mr. Bharda for the applicant has

submitted the undertaking of the applicant wherein it is

stated that the applicant and co-accused Ashwinbhai

Narayanbhai Patel would deposit Rs.40 lakhs more,

within a period of 6 months whereby, Rs. 10 lakhs

would be deposited on or before 10.05.2026, and

thereafter, the remaining balance amount of Rs.30 lakhs

in monthly installments of Rs.5 lakhs each, commencing

from June 2026 till December 2026.

5. Learned advocate Mr. Bharda has also stated that,

till date, the Bank has recovered Rs.4,65,00,000/- from

the applicant and co-accused Ashwinbhai. Hence,

considering the undertaking as a gesture of willingness

from the applicant to show his bonafide, the undertaking

may be accepted and the bail application may be

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

allowed.

6. Learned advocate Mr. K. J. Panchal on behalf of

the respondent Bank has at the outset submitted that,

inspite of the Bank having recovered Rs.4,65,00,000/-

from the applicant and the co-accused, there still remains

huge amount to be recovered from the applicant. Mr.

Panchal has drawn the attention of the Court to the fact

that, previously, when the Court had given time to the

applicant and the co-accused, upon their own request and

volition to deposit loan amount, they had faltered and

had failed to deposit the monies as promised before the

Court, pursuant to which, their bails were cancelled. Mr.

Panchal upon instructions, has submitted that the applicant and the co-accused if at all want to show their

bonafide, out of the total amount of Rs.40,00,000/- as

promised by them, at this juncture must deposit

Rs.20,00,000/- and thereafter, the remaining amount of

Rs.20,00,000/- during the period of six months.

7. Mr. Panchal has also submitted that the Bank is

ready and willing to accept this amount without

prejudice to the Bank's civil rights as well as their

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

averments in the complaints filed under the Negotiable

Instruments Act before the concerned Court, against the

applicant and the co-accused.

8. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Surat

district, hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. Investigation is over. Charge-sheet has been filed.

iii. Out of the total loan amount with accrued interest

there upon till date, the Bank has recovered

Rs.4,65,00,000/- from the applicant and the co-accused.

iv. The applicant and co-accused Ashwinbhai having submitted separate undertakings to deposit Rs.10 lakhs

before the trial Court on or before 10.05.2026 and

thereafter, shall deposit the remaining amount of

Rs.30 lakhs in monthly installments of Rs.5 lakhs

each, commencing from June 2026 until December

2026.

v. The applicant and co-accused have also shown

willingness to file similar undertakings before the trial

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

Court.

vi. The apprehension of the learned APP that,

the applicant would once again indulge in similar

or such offence, can be put to rest by imposing

stringent conditions.

9. This Court has taken into consideration the law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation

reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

10. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

11. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11201016200007 of 2020 with CID Crime (Surat Zone)

Police Station, District Surat, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of

the prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the local limits of Surat district without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence once every month before the concerned police station till the trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file an affidavit before the

concerned court and the police station.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

[h] A fresh undertaking to be filed by the applicant before the trial Court within 10 days of his release based upon the undertaking that has been presented before this Court today, and based upon the substance of the said undertaking, the Court having passed this order.

12. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions

is committed, the Court concerned will be at liberty to

take appropriate action in accordance with law.

13. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for

the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of

the above conditions in accordance with law.

14. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not

be influenced by any observations of this Court which

are of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for

the purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1778/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026

undefined

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) MAYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter