Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishalkumar Rajendrabhai Gamit vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2751 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2751 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vishalkumar Rajendrabhai Gamit vs State Of Gujarat on 24 April, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/9205/2026                             ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

                                                                                                           undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
                                        AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 9205 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                                                VISHALKUMAR RAJENDRABHAI GAMIT
                                                              Versus
                                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        RAFIK LOKHANDWALA(5590) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR HARDIK MEHTA ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                             CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                        Date : 24/04/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Rafik Lokhandwala appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Hardik Mehta appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9205/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

undefined

11824010250010 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime Police Station, District: Tapi for the offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a), 3(5) of the BNS Act and under Section 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that since the charge-sheet is filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9205/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

undefined

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. Allegation being that the accused had indulging in laundering of money through the medium of mule account.

ii. The applicant being alleged the role of mule account holder and whereas it is alleged an amount of Rs.1,45,00,000/- approximately had come to the account of the present applicant.

iii. While it would appear that the amount which had come to the account, is substantially huge, yet, this Court has considered the fact that there only four complaints registered in the NCCR Portal against the account of the present applicant.

iv. This Court has also consider the aspect of the present applicant not being attributed the principle role of laundering the money.

v. The Court has considered the fact that the applicant being in custody since 10.12.2026 and the charge-sheet having been filed and the applicant having no other antecedents, this Court is inclined to allow this application by imposing suitable conditions.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9205/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

undefined

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No. 11824010250010 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime Police Station, District: Tapi , on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9205/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

undefined

the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] mark presence once in a month for a period of one year before the concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant for being released on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9205/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/04/2026

undefined

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) NAIR SMITA V./18-DB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter