Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahul Mangabhai Rawal vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2694 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2694 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rahul Mangabhai Rawal vs State Of Gujarat on 23 April, 2026

                                                                                                                   NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/9438/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                          CHARGESHEET) NO. 9438 of 2026
                        ==========================================================
                                                       RAHUL MANGABHAI RAWAL
                                                                Versus
                                                       STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR SOAHAM JOSHI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 23/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11206038240348 of

2024 registered with Laghnaj Police Station, Mehsana,

for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and

376(2)(n) of the IPC as well as Sections 4, 5(L), 6 and 8 of

the POCSO Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, the applicant was released on regular bail by the

Sessions Court, Mehsana vide order dated 01.07.2025

passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 751 of 2025,

subject to conditions. However, the applicant could not

remain present before the court during the trial, hence

Non-Bailable Warrant was issued, pursuant to which he

came to be arrested. Learned advocate for the applicant

has submitted that, henceforth the applicant would

regularly remain present before the court and would file

an undertaking to that effect before the concerned court.

Thus, the present application may be allowed.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that because of the applicant's

absence, the trial has protracted and the applicant having

committed breach of bail conditions, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Mehsana,

hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant was granted regular bail by the

Sessions Court, Mehsana vide order dated 01.07.2025

passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 751 of 2025;

iii. As submitted by learned advocate for the applicant

under instructions, the applicant could not remain

present for the hearing of the case being POCSO Case

No. 71 of 2025, as he was not aware about the date of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

hearing;

iv. The applicant and the victim have married each

other and have a child out of the wedlock;

v. The applicant does not have any criminal

antecedents.

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicants in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11206038240348 of 2024 registered with Laghnaj Police

Station, Mehsana, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of

the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and

on payment of Rs.5,000/- towards costs to be deposited

with the District Legal Services Authority, Surat, subject

to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Trial Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence before the concerned police

station once a week till the trial is over;

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9438/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail. The

application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) DIVYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter