Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nitukumar Harpalsing Chaudhary vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2693 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2693 Guj
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Nitukumar Harpalsing Chaudhary vs State Of Gujarat on 23 April, 2026

                                                                                                                   NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/9407/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 9407 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                            NITUKUMAR HARPALSING CHAUDHARY
                                                         Versus
                                                   STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       DIGPALSNGH H RATHORE(8083) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                           Date : 23/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Digpalsingh H. Rathore

appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Soaham Joshi appearing

on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11214021260236 of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9407/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

2026 registered with Kosamba Police Station, Surat Rural

for the offences punishable under Sections 65-E, 81, 98(2)

and 116(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the

conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if released

on bail. Learned advocate has also submitted that, the

applicant's wife is residing at the native village in

Haryana and is pregnant. The applicant if released on

bail, shall mark his presence at the police station near

to his native village in Haryana.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant, this

Court may not exercise discretion in favour of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9407/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant though a resident of Haryana, would

be available at the time of trial;

ii. the applicant is the driver and owner of the truck

which was used for transportation of contraband

liquor;

iii. The applicant does not have any criminal

antecedents;

iv. The apprehension of the learned APP that, the

applicant would once again indulge in similar or such

offence, can be put to rest by imposing stringent

conditions.

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation

reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9407/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on

bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.

11214021260236 of 2026 with Kosamba Police Station,

Surat Rural, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two local

sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of

the prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9407/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

[d] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[e] mark his presence every alternate day for one

month before the Siwani Police Station, Haryana;

[f] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, he shall file an affidavit before the

concerned court and the police station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions

is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for

the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of

the above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9407/2026 ORDER DATED: 23/04/2026

undefined

be influenced by any observations of this Court which

are of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for

the purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) MAYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter