Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajay @Ankit Jerambhai Udhreja vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2634 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2634 Guj
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ajay @Ankit Jerambhai Udhreja vs State Of Gujarat on 22 April, 2026

                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/9405/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

                                                                                                                 undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 9405 of 2026

                       ==========================================================

AJAY @ANKIT JERAMBHAI UDHREJA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance:

SAJID Y KARIYANIYA(9619) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI

Date : 22/04/2026

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11211050250558 of

2025 registered with Thangadh Police Station,

Surendranagar, for the offence punishable under Sections

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

179 and 180 of the BNS.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail. Learned

advocate upon instructions submits that the applicant will

remain within the State of Gujarat during the trial.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of District:

Surendranagar, hence, would be available at the time

of trial.

ii. The applicant has one antecedent which is not of

identical nature.

iii. The co-accused Ashish Mori was found in possession

of 97 counterfeit currency notes of Rs.500

denomination.

iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant and co-

accused Ashish Mori had bought counterfeit currency

notes of Rs.500 denomination from one Shivam Varma,

which they had introduced in the market.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

v. The co-accused Ashish Mori has been released on

regular bail by the coordinate bench of this Court vide

order dated 09.01.2026 passed in Criminal Misc.

Application No.27898 of 2025.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

with FIR being C.R. No. 11211050250558 of 2025

registered with Thangadh Police Station, Surendranagar,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty

Five Thousand only) with two local sureties of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to

the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the trial court within

a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall

file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of

the bond along with documentary proof and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the

I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence every day twice in the morning and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

evening for a period of one month, thereafter on every

alternate day for a period of one month and thereafter

on every Wednesday before the concerned police

station till the trial is over.

[g] not to leave Surendranagar till the trial is over

without prior permission permission of the Sessions

Court concerned;

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent Court shall not

be influenced by any observations of this Court which are

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9405/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter