Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakshit Kalpeshbhai Kuvariya vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2628 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2628 Guj
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rakshit Kalpeshbhai Kuvariya vs State Of Gujarat on 22 April, 2026

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/9282/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 9282 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                               RAKSHIT KALPESHBHAI KUVARIYA
                                                           Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR ANIL H RATHOD(9691) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                              DESAI

                                                           Date : 22/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anil Rathod appearing on behalf

of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.

Soaham Joshi appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

No.11189010250011 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9282/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

Station, District Morbi for the offence punishable under Sections

316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54 and 317(2) of the BNS, 2023.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It

is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further

incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the Investigation

Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be

imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9282/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Morbi district, hence

would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The allegation against the applicant is that he had given his

account for the purpose of money laundering;

iii. The are no criminal antecedents against the applicant;

iv. The applicant has received the commission of Rs.15,000/- for

providing his account;

v. The investigation is over and chargesheet has been filed;

vi. Co-accused Nikunj Dalsaniya has been granted regular bail by

the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 07.04.2026 passed in

CRMA No.8002 of 2026;

vii.The apprehension of learned APP as regards the applicants

once again indulging in similar kind of offence after being

granted bail, can be put to rest by imposing stringent conditions;

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9282/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise

the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No.11189010250011 of 2025 registered with Cybercrime

Police Station, District Morbi, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject

to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9282/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the

court;

[f] mark his alternate day presence for two months thereafter on

every Monday before the concerned police station till the trial is

over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which,

he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the police

station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9282/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/04/2026

undefined

Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in

accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter