Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hirenbhai @Potiyo Kikubhai Premabhai ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2577 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2577 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Hirenbhai @Potiyo Kikubhai Premabhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 21 April, 2026

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/9064/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 9064 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                   HIRENBHAI @POTIYO KIKUBHAI PREMABHAI PATEL
                                                     Versus
                                               STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      KRUNAL S MEHTA(9227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                           Date : 21/04/2026

                                                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Krunal Mehta appearing on

behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.

Soaham Joshi appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

No.11200050260120 of 2026 registered with Nanapondha Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9064/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

undefined

Station, District Valsad for the offence punishable under Sections

65(a), 65(e), 98, 116(b) and 81 of the Prohibition Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the

allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It

is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further

incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the Investigation

Officer in any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be

imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to

the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9064/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

undefined

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Valsad district,

hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant has two previous antecedents;

iii. The learned advocate for the applicant submits that, the

applicant has been acquitted in both the offences and has placed

both the judgments on record;

iv. As per the prosecution case, the applicant was piloting the

vehicle, which was transporting the contraband liquor;

v. The investigation being over and the charge-sheet has been

filed;

vi. The apprehension of learned APP as regards the applicants

once again indulging in similar kind of offence after being

granted bail, can be put to rest by imposing stringent conditions;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9064/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

undefined

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by

the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central

Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise

the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No.11200050260120 of 2026 registered with Nanapondha

Police Station, District Valsad, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject

to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9064/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

undefined

prosecution;

[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the Valsad district without prior permission of the

Competent Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and to

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the

court;

[f] mark his alternate day presence for one month and thereafter

on every Wednesday before the concerned police station till the

trial is over;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for which,

he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and the police

station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/9064/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026

undefined

breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions

Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate action in

accordance with law.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court

to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in

accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) KAJAL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter