Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kadirbhai Gulabbhai Khokhar vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2515 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2515 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Kadirbhai Gulabbhai Khokhar vs State Of Gujarat on 20 April, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.RA/379/2010                                       JUDGMENT DATED: 20/04/2026

                                                                                                                   undefined




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 379 of 2010


                      FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                      ============================================

                                   Approved for Reporting                        Yes           No

                      ============================================
                                     KADIRBHAI GULABBHAI KHOKHAR
                                                   Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ============================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(1077) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                      MR ROHAN H. RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ============================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                       Date : 20/04/2026

                                                             JUDGMENT

1) By way of present revision application under Sections 397 read

with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant

has prayed for quashing and setting aside the judgment and

order of conviction and sentence dated 24.12.2008 passed by

the learned 5th Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Rajkot in Criminal

Case No.11403 of 2005, whereby, the trial Court has been

pleased to hold the applicant guilty for the offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/379/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/04/2026

undefined

shall hereinafter be referred to as "NI Act" for short) and

sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and

also directed to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment

of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for two months.

The said order was assailed by way of filing Criminal Appeal

No.03 of 2009, wherein, vide order dated 17.07.2010 passed by

the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.6,

Rajkot, the appeal came to be dismissed and the order of

conviction has been confirmed and upheld by the concerned

Additional District Judge. Hence, the present Revision Application

is filed by the applicant-accused.

2) Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that during

the pendency of the present revision application the applicant

has deposited the cheque amount. He has further submitted that

the applicant has already undergone 10 days custody. The

receipt of payment is taken on record. In view of above once the

amount being deposited and as the offence under Section 138 of

the NI Act is quasi-criminal in character and is compoundable

and punishment under the NI Act is not a means of seeking

retribution but is more a means to ensure payment of money

and to promote credibility of cheques as a trustworthy substitute

for cash payment. In absence of any perversity and no ground is

found to upset the concurrent findings of the learned trial Court

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/379/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/04/2026

undefined

and Appellate Court and it is not open for Revisional Court to re-

analyse and re-interpret the evidence in revisional jurisdiction.

No case is made out to interfere with the reasons assigned by

both the Courts.

3) At the same time this Court has taken into consideration the

object of the Act as accused made payment and complainant has

received the same, hence, in view of judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court Sanjabij Tari Vs Kishore S. Borcar, Neutral

Citation 2025 INSC 1158, maintaining the conviction this Court

is inclined to extend the benefit under the Probation of Offenders

Act, 1958, to the applicant-accused.

4) Accordingly, the applicant - accused is directed to be released

on probation of good conduct under Section 4 of the Probation of

Offenders Act, upon execution of probation bond in sum of

Rs.20,000/-, with one surety of like amount for a period of six

(6) months.

5) It is hereby further directed that the applicant - accused shall

receive the sentence as and when called upon till the said period

and the applicant shall maintain peace during above mentioned

period of six (6) months.

6) The above mentioned bond under Section 4 of the Probation of

Offenders Act, be submitted before the learned trial Court within

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.RA/379/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/04/2026

undefined

15 days of passing of this judgment.

7) Accordingly, present revision application is disposed of. Record

and proceedings, if any, be sent back to the concerned Court

forthwith.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) ANKIT JANSARI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter