Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahavirsinh Pappubhai Vaghela vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2459 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2459 Guj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Mahavirsinh Pappubhai Vaghela vs State Of Gujarat on 17 April, 2026

                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/8891/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

                                                                                                               undefined




                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                               R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                           CHARGESHEET) NO. 8891 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                                                  MAHAVIRSINH PAPPUBHAI VAGHELA
                                                               Versus
                                                        STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR SOAHAM JOSHI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                 DESAI

                                                           Date : 17/04/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of

the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for

enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

with FIR being C.R. No. 11189004252335 of 2025

registered with Morbi City 'B' Division Police Station,

Morbi, for the offence punishable under Sections 316(5),

318(4), 54, 317(2) and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Morbi, hence

would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents.

iii. As per the prosecution case, the role of the applicant

is that of providing his own mule account to the main

accused, wherein, the fraudulent money to the tune of

Rs.13,23,000/- was deposited, for which he had received

commission of Rs.8,500/-.

iv. The role of the applicant is akin to co-accused Pratik

Jiteshbhai Kubavat, who too had given his mule account

as well as his relative's mule account to the main

accused, and who has been considered for regular bail by

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

the coordinate bench vide order dated 08.04.2026 passed

in Criminal Misc. Application No. 7756 of 2026;

v. The apprehension of learned APP, as regards the

applicant indulging in similar kind of offence, if granted

bail, can be put to rest by imposing stringent conditions.

7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

with FIR being C.R. No. 11189004252335 of 2025

registered with Morbi City 'B' Division Police Station,

Morbi, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to

the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file

an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission

of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O.

and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond

and shall not change his residence without prior

intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Monday before the concerned

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

police station till the completion of trial;

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for

which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned court

and the police station.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is

not required in connection with any other offence for the

time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to

take appropriate action in the matter.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8891/2026 ORDER DATED: 17/04/2026

undefined

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule

is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) DIVYA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter