Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mayurbhai Babubhai Dangar vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2359 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2359 Guj
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2026

[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Mayurbhai Babubhai Dangar vs State Of Gujarat on 16 April, 2026

                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/8581/2026                             ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026

                                                                                                          undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 8581
                                                   of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                              MAYURBHAI BABUBHAI DANGAR & ANR.
                                                           Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR. MAHESH POOJARA, ADVOCATE FOR MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for
                       the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
                       MR. TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                            CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

                                                       Date : 16/04/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr. Abhishek Khuman appears and submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent no.2 - original complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance. Registry shall accept his vakalatnama as and when the same is filed.

2. By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicants-accused seek to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set-aside the First Information Report No. 11189003231262 of 2023 registered with the 'A' Division Morbi City Police Station, Morbi, for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8581/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026

undefined

Indian Penal Code and under Section 40, 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act; as well as the charge-sheet and the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 407 of 2024, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.

3. Today, when the matter is called out, the complainant, who is personally present before this Court, has produced his identity proof as well as submitted his affidavit. The same are ordered to be taken on record. In the said affidavit, the complainant has categorically stated that with the intervention of the friends, family members and community people, the dispute with the present applicants has been amicably resolved and there is no ill-will or any grievance amongst them.

4. Considering the issue involved in the present application as well as considering the fact that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, with the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the present application is taken up for final disposal.

5. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr. Tirthraj Pandya waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 - State and learned advocate Mr. Abhishek Khuman waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.2 - complainant.

6. Learned advocate for the applicants-accused has

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8581/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026

undefined

submitted that since the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, the application may be allowed and the impugned FIR, the charge-sheet as well as the proceedings of the Criminal Case, may be quashed and set-aside.

7. The complainant, who is personally present in the Court, has categorically stated before this Court that he has no objection if the application is allowed and the FIR, the charge- sheet as well as the proceedings of the Criminal Case are quashed and set-aside. Thus, it appears from the aforesaid that sending the applicants-accused to face the trial would be nothing but a futile exercise and would amount to abuse of process of law.

8. The relevant paragraphs of the affidavit filed by the complainant - Yashbhai Bhimjibhai Rangpariya, read thus :

"3. I say and submit that at present dispute between applicants and myself came to be amicably resolved, now no ill will grievances exists amongst us, under these set of circumstances, if the Hon'ble Court pleased to quash the F.I.R qua the applicant, I've no objection.

4. I've borrowed Rs. 5 lac from applicants no. 1 and I have repaid him Rs. 3 lac only as he has waived off Rs. 2 lac and further even no interest has been charged from me and furthermore even he has also returned me two cheques, which I had given him for security purpose and that is how matter has been amicably resolved between us.

5. I say and submit that I have borrowed Rs. 8 lac from applicants no. 2 and I have repaid him Rs. 5 lac only as he has waived off Rs. 3 lac and further even no interest has been charged from me and furthermore even he has also returned me two cheques, which I had given him for security purpose and that is how matter has been amicably resolved between us and account is also settled.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8581/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026

undefined

6. I further say that in view of this amicable settlement, if Hon'ble Court please quash the F.I.R as well as Criminal Case No. 407 of 2024 pending before the Taluka Court, Morbi qua present applicants by exercising its power u/s 528 of BNSS, I've no objection."

9. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application and taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2009) 1 GLH 31, Manoj Sharma vs. State & Others, reported in (2009) 1 GLH 190, and Narinder Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Another, reported in (2014) 2 Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana vs. Bhajanlal, reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that further continuation of the criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR, the chargesheet and the Criminal Case against the applicants-accused would be nothing but unnecessary harassment to the applicants-accused. It further appears that the trial would be a futile exercise and continuing further with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR, the charge-sheet and the Criminal Case would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR, the chargesheet as well as the proceedings of the Criminal Case, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be quashed and set-

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/8581/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026

undefined

aside in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

10. In the result, the application is allowed. The First Information Report No. 11189003231262 of 2023 registered with the 'A' Division Morbi City Police Station, Morbi, for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 40, 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act; as well as the charge-sheet and the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 407 of 2024, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are hereby ordered to be quashed and set-aside, qua the present applicants only.

11. Rule made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(VIMAL K. VYAS, J) AMAR SINGH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter